Reproductive health and rights, and public policies in Brazil: revisiting challenges during covid-19 pandemics

被引:7
作者
Grilo Diniz, Carmen Simone [1 ]
Cabral, Cristiane da Silva [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Publ Hlth, Av Dr Arnaldo 715,Sala 203, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
关键词
Reproductive rights; reproductive health; social movements; public policies; COVID-19; CHILDBIRTH; DISRESPECT; ABUSE;
D O I
10.1080/17441692.2021.1995463
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
We revisit the debates on reproductive health and rights (RHR) and public policies in Brazil, with focus on contraception, abortion and maternity care. These were part of a broader political agenda for re-democratisation, and for health sector reform, with the creation of the Women's Integral Health Program (PAISM) in 1983, and of the Universal Health System (SUS) in 1988. The momentum created by ICPD in Cairo (1994) was essential to institutionalise the language of RHR. Not without resistance and organised activism, recent years of right-wing governments brought a disinvestment in most public policies for women's rights. Some components of the RHR agenda are more mainstreamed, such as fertility regulation, especially hormonal and long term-methods. The limited legal rights to abortion are poorly institutionalised and constantly threatened. Maternal care tends to be highly medicalised and frequently abusive. The covid-19 pandemic accelerated social and public health disruption. The article addresses notions such as reproductive justice and institutional violence, present in the early days of women's health movement, in order to highlight important premises that were diluted in the debate on reproductive rights and autonomy. The historical analysis of how these concepts evolved locally and globally can allow a better understanding of present challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:3175 / 3188
页数:14
相关论文
共 53 条
[41]   Beyond measurement: the drivers of disrespect and abuse in obstetric care [J].
Sen, Gita ;
Reddy, Bhavya ;
Iyer, Aditi .
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2018, 26 (53) :6-18
[42]  
Sena LM, 2017, INTERFACE-BOTUCATU, V21, P209
[44]   Latin American social medicine: Roots, development during the 1990s, and current challenges [J].
Tajer, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2003, 93 (12) :2023-2027
[45]   Clinical characteristics and risk factors for mortality in obstetric patients with severe COVID-19 in Brazil: a surveillance database analysis [J].
Takemoto, M. L. S. ;
Menezes, M. O. ;
Andreucci, C. B. ;
Knobel, R. ;
Sousa, L. ;
Katz, L. ;
Fonseca, E. B. ;
Nakamura-Pereira, M. ;
Magalhaes, C. G. ;
Diniz, C. S. G. ;
Melo, A. S. O. ;
Amorim, M. M. R. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 127 (13) :1618-1626
[46]   Factors associated with unintended pregnancy in Brazil: cross-sectional results from the Birth in Brazil National Survey, 2011/2012 [J].
Theme-Filha, Mariza Miranda ;
Baldisserotto, Marcia Leonardi ;
Santos Amaral Fraga, Ana Claudia ;
Ayers, Susan ;
Nogueira da Gama, Silvana Granado ;
Leal, Maria do Carmo .
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2016, 13
[47]   In the response to COVID-19, we can't forget health system commitments to contraception and family planning [J].
Townsend, John W. ;
ten Hoope-Bender, Petra ;
Sheffield, Jill .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2020, 150 (03) :273-274
[48]  
UNFPA, 2020, IMP COVID 19 PAND FA
[49]  
UNFPA, 2020, IMP COV 19 ACC CONTR
[50]  
UNFPA, 2020, SAUD SEX REPR DIR CO