Three-Dimensional DEM Analysis of Axially Loaded Geogrid-Encased Stone Column in Clay Bed

被引:35
作者
Gu, Meixiang [1 ,2 ]
Han, Jie [3 ]
Zhao, Minghua [4 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Kansas, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, 2150 Learned Hall,1530 W 15th St, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Univ Kansas, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Geotech Engn, 2150 Learned Hall,1530 W 15th St, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[4] Hunan Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China
关键词
Geosynthetics; Discrete element method; Stone column; Geogrid encasement; Particle interaction; MODEL TESTS; BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE; COMPRESSION;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001595
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The discrete-element method (DEM) was employed in this study to analyze the micromechanical behavior of an axially loaded geogrid-encased stone column (GESC) installed in a clay bed. A three-dimensional DEM model was developed to simulate a partially encased stone column in the laboratory test under a plate loading condition. The aggregate, the geogrid encasement, and the surrounding soil were simulated using particles with different sizes and micromechanical properties. The load-displacement behavior of the DEM model closely matched the experimental result during the loading process. This study investigated the vertical and radial stresses in the column and its surrounding soil, the porosity change and particle movement in the column, and the contact force distributions before and after loading. The interaction and the interlocking effect between particles were different in the encased and unreinforced sections due to the existence of the geogrid encasement. The surrounding soil developed high vertical and radial stresses in the layers below the base of the geogrid encasement due to the strong interaction between the aggregate and the soil. The maximum coefficient of radial stress (2.4) in the encased column was approximately half the coefficient of passive earth pressure (4.6). The current design method overestimated the bearing capacity of the GESC based on the coefficient of passive earth pressure.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Alexiew D., 2012, P ISSMGE TECHN COMM
[2]   Model tests on geosynthetic-reinforced stone columns: a comparative study [J].
Ali, K. ;
Shahu, J. T. ;
Sharma, K. G. .
GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 19 (04) :292-305
[3]   Behavior of Geotextile-Encased Granular Columns Supporting Test Embankment on Soft Deposit [J].
Almeida, Marcio S. S. ;
Hosseinpour, Iman ;
Riccio, Mario ;
Alexiew, Dimiter .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 141 (03)
[4]   Shaking table tests on geosynthetic encased columns in soft clay [J].
Cengiz, C. ;
Guler, E. .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2018, 46 (06) :748-758
[5]   Seismic behavior of geosynthetic encased columns and ordinary stone columns [J].
Cengiz, C. ;
Guler, E. .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2018, 46 (01) :40-51
[6]   Uniaxial compression behavior of geotextile encased stone columns [J].
Chen, Jian-Feng ;
Wang, Xing-Tao ;
Xue, Jian-Feng ;
Zeng, Yue ;
Feng, Shou-Zhong .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2018, 46 (03) :277-283
[7]   Failure mechanism of geosynthetic-encased stone columns in soft soils under embankment [J].
Chen, Jian-Feng ;
Li, Liang-Yong ;
Xue, Jian-Feng ;
Feng, Shou-Zhong .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2015, 43 (05) :424-431
[8]   DISCRETE NUMERICAL-MODEL FOR GRANULAR ASSEMBLIES [J].
CUNDALL, PA ;
STRACK, ODL .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 1979, 29 (01) :47-65
[9]   Bearing capacity of geogrid reinforced sand over encased stone columns in soft clay [J].
Debnath, Prasenjit ;
Dey, Ashim Kanti .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2017, 45 (06) :653-664
[10]   Bearing capacity of geosynthetic encased stone columns [J].
Ghazavi, Mahmoud ;
Afshar, Javad Nazari .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2013, 38 :26-36