Experimental and numerical study on a laminar fluid-structure interaction reference test case

被引:37
作者
Gomes, J. Pereira [1 ,2 ]
Yigit, S. [3 ]
Lienhart, H. [1 ,2 ]
Schaefer, M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Inst Fluid Mech, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Erlangen Grad Sch Adv Opt Technol, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Dept Numer Methods Mech Engn, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany
关键词
Fluid-structure interaction; Self-induced excitation; Reference experiment; Numerical simulation; Laminar flow; VORTEX-INDUCED VIBRATION; CYLINDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2010.09.004
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
With the rapid development of numerical codes for fluid-structure interaction computations, the demand for validation test cases increases. In this paper we present a comparison between numerical and experimental results for such a fluid-structure interaction reference test case. The investigated structural model consists of an aluminum front cylinder with an attached thin metal plate and a rear mass at the trailing edge. All the structure is free to rotate around the axle mounted in the center of the front cylinder. The model's geometry and mechanical properties are chosen in such a way as to attain a self-exciting periodical swiveling movement when exposed to a uniform laminar flow. Reproducibility of the coupled fluid-structure motion is the key criterion for the selection of the model in order to permit an accurate reconstruction of the results in the time-phase space. The Reynolds number of the tests varies up to 270 and within that range the structure undergoes large deformations and shows a strong nonlinear behavior. It also presents two different self-excitation mechanisms depending on the flow velocity. Hence, challenging tasks arise for both the numerical solution algorithm and the experimental measurements. To account for the two different excitation mechanisms observed on increasing the speed of the flow, results for two different velocities are considered: the first at 1.07 m/s (Re=140) and the second at 1.45 m/s (Re=195). The comparisons presented in this paper are carried out on the basis of the time trace of the front body angle, trailing edge coordinates, structure deformation and the time-phase resolved flow velocity field. They reveal very good agreement in some of the fluid-structure interaction modes whereas in others deficiencies are observed that need to be analyzed in more detail. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 61
页数:19
相关论文
共 20 条
[11]  
Naudascher E., 1994, Flow Induced Vibrations
[12]  
OGDEN LW, 1997, NONLINEAR ELASTIC DE
[13]  
Schafer M., 2006, Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, V53, P171
[14]  
SOULI M, 2007, REV EUROPEENNE MECAN
[15]  
Taylor R.L., 2002, FEAP, A Finite Element Analysis Program
[16]  
Taylor RL, 2003, FEAP a finite element analysis program
[17]  
*TU DARMST DEP NUM, 2004, FASTEST US MAN
[18]   NUMERICAL-ANALYSIS OF 2D VORTEX-INDUCED OSCILLATIONS OF A CIRCULAR-CYLINDER [J].
WEI, R ;
SEKINE, A ;
SHIMURA, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, 1995, 21 (10) :993-1005
[19]   Numerical simulations of vortex-induced vibration on flexible cylinders [J].
Yamamoto, CT ;
Meneghini, JR ;
Saltara, F ;
Fregonesi, RA ;
Ferrari, JA .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2004, 19 (04) :467-489
[20]   Efficiency of fluid-structure interaction simulations with adaptive underrelaxation and multigrid acceleration [J].
Yigit, S. ;
Sternel, D. ;
Schaefer, M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHYSICS, 2007, 1 (01) :85-99