Steroid injections for shoulder disorders: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials

被引:0
|
作者
vanderHeijden, GJMG
vanderWindt, DAWM
Kleijnen, J
Koes, BW
Bouter, LM
机构
[1] VRIJE UNIV AMSTERDAM,INST RES EXTRAMURAL MED,AMSTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
[2] UNIV AMSTERDAM,ACAD MED CTR,DEPT CLIN EPIDEMIOL & BIOSTAT,1105 AZ AMSTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE | 1996年 / 46卷 / 406期
关键词
shoulder; steroids; injections; systematic review; randomized clinical trials;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Patients with shoulder disorders are believed to benefit considerably from steroid injections. However, the controversy about their efficacy persists. Aim. The study was designed to assess the efficacy of steroid injections for shoulder disorders. Method. A systematic computerized literature search in Medline (Index Medicos 1/1966-10/1995) and Embase (Excerpta Medica 1/1984-10/1995) was conducted, supplemented with citation tracking of all relevant publications. Studies published before November 1995 were selected if steroid injections were randomly allocated to patients with shoulder disorders and when clinically relevant outcome measures were reported. Because the validity of study outcomes depends heavily on the strength of methodological quality, the methods were assessed systematically by two 'blinded' independent reviewers. This resulted in a method score (maximum 100 points) that was based on four categories: study population, interventions, measurement of effect, and data presentation and analysis. Confidence intervals for the differences between groups in success rates were calculated in order to summarize the efficacy of steroid injections. Results. Only three out of the 16 studies scored more than 50 points, indicating a generally poor quality of methods. Most studies reported small sample sizes. The flaws most often found were incomparability of co-interventions and poor blinding of therapist. The methods assessment was frequently hampered by incomplete information about randomization, prognostic comparability, compliance, outcome measures included, blinding of patients and blinding of outcome measurement. Conclusions. The evidence in favour of the efficacy of steroid injections for shoulder disorders is scarce. The methods of most studies appear to be of poor quality. The few studies that appear to be credible do not provide conclusive evidence about which patients at what time in the course of shoulder disorders benefit most from steroid injections.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 316
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Shoulder adhesive capsulitis: systematic review of randomised trials using multiple corticosteroid injections
    Shah, Nicholas
    Lewis, Mark
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2007, 57 (541): : 662 - 667
  • [2] Acupuncture for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Myeong Soo Lee
    Tae-Young Choi
    Byung-Cheul Shin
    Edzard Ernst
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2012, 42 : 1671 - 1683
  • [3] Acupuncture for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Lee, Myeong Soo
    Choi, Tae-Young
    Shin, Byung-Cheul
    Ernst, Edzard
    JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2012, 42 (08) : 1671 - 1683
  • [4] Intervention randomized controlled trials involving wrist and shoulder arthroscopy: a systematic review
    Kamelia Tadjerbashi
    Roberto S Rosales
    Isam Atroshi
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 15
  • [5] Intervention randomized controlled trials involving wrist and shoulder arthroscopy: a systematic review
    Tadjerbashi, Kamelia
    Rosales, Roberto S.
    Atroshi, Isam
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2014, 15
  • [6] Effectiveness of Psychobiotics in the Treatment of Psychiatric and Cognitive Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Mosquera, Freiser Eceomo Cruz
    Lizcano Martinez, Santiago
    Liscano, Yamil
    NUTRIENTS, 2024, 16 (09)
  • [7] Steroid hormones for contraception in men: systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Grimes, DA
    Gallo, MF
    Grigorieva, V
    Nanda, K
    Schulz, KF
    CONTRACEPTION, 2005, 71 (02) : 89 - 94
  • [8] The Efficacy of Bibliotherapy in Depression Management: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Pannu, Arzoo
    Goyal, Ramesh K.
    Sharma, Kalicharan
    CURRENT PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2024,
  • [9] Prevention of Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials
    Watson, Hunna J.
    Joyce, Tara
    French, Elizabeth
    Willan, Vivienne
    Kane, Robert T.
    Tanner-Smith, Emily E.
    McCormack, Julie
    Dawkins, Hayley
    Hoiles, Kimberley J.
    Egan, Sarah J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, 2016, 49 (09) : 833 - 862
  • [10] Regenerative medicine in the treatment of specific dermatologic disorders: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials
    Jafarzadeh, Alireza
    Mohammad, Arash Pour
    Keramati, Haniyeh
    Zeinali, Roya
    Khosravi, Mina
    Goodarzi, Azadeh
    STEM CELL RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2024, 15 (01)