Fully integrated modelling for sustainability assessment of resource recovery from waste

被引:60
|
作者
Millward-Hopkins, Joel [1 ]
Busch, Jonathan [3 ]
Purnell, Phil [1 ]
Zwirner, Oliver [2 ]
Velis, Costas A. [1 ]
Brown, Andrew [2 ]
Hahladakis, John [1 ]
Iacovidou, Eleni [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Civil Engn, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Business, Leeds Univ, Econ Div, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Sustainabil Res Inst, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Life cycle sustainability analysis; Material flow analysis; Resource recovery; Sustainability assessment; Multidimensional value; Circular economy; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; DECISION-SUPPORT TOOL; CIRCULAR ECONOMY; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; FLOW-ANALYSIS; FRAMEWORK; BENEFIT; ENERGY; GENERATION; STOCKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.211
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper presents an integrated modelling approach for value assessments, focusing on resource recovery from waste. The method tracks and forecasts a range of values across environmental, social, economic and technical domains by attaching these to material-flows, thus building upon and integrating unidimensional models such as material flow analysis (MFA) and lifecycle assessment (LCA). We argue that the usual classification of metrics into these separate domains is useful for interpreting the outputs of multidimensional assessments, but unnecessary for modelling. We thus suggest that multidimensional assessments can be better performed by integrating the calculation methods of unidimensional models rather than their outputs. To achieve this, we propose a new metric typology that forms the foundation of a multidimensional model. This enables dynamic simulations to be performed with material-flows (or values in any domain) driven by changes in value in other domains. We then apply the model in an illustrative case highlighting links between the UK coal-based electricity-production and concrete/cement industries, investigating potential impacts that may follow the increased use of low-carbon fuels (biomass and solid recovered fuels; SRF) in the former. We explore synergies and trade-offs in value across domains and regions, e.g. how changes in carbon emissions in one part of the system may affect mortality elsewhere. This highlights the advantages of recognising complex system dynamics and making high-level inferences of their effects, even when rigorous analysis is not possible. We also indicate how changes in social, environmental and economic 'values' can be understood as being driven by changes in the technical value of resources. Our work thus emphasises the advantages of building fully integrated models to inform conventional sustainability assessments, rather than applying hybrid approaches that integrate outputs from parallel models. The approach we present demonstrates that this is feasible and lays the foundations for such an integrated model. Crown Copyright (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 624
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sustainability assessment of increased circularity of urban organic waste streams
    Ddiba, Daniel
    Ekener, Elisabeth
    Lindkvist, Mathias
    Finnveden, Goran
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 34 : 114 - 129
  • [2] Exploring essential factors to improve waste-to-resource recovery: A roadmap towards sustainability
    Yu, Zhang
    Khan, Syed Abdul Rehman
    Ponce, Pablo
    Zia-ul-haq, Hafiz Muhammad
    Ponce, Katerine
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 350
  • [3] Resource recovery and low carbon transitions: The hidden impacts of substituting cement with imported 'waste' materials from coal and steel production
    Millward-Hopkins, Joel
    Zwirner, Oliver
    Purnell, Phil
    Velis, Costas A.
    Iacovidou, Eleni
    Brown, Andrew
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2018, 53 : 146 - 156
  • [4] Sustainability assessment of waste and wastewater recovery for edible mushroom production through an integrated nexus. A case study in Lazio
    Vinci, G.
    Prencipe, S. A.
    Pucinischi, L.
    Perrotta, F.
    Ruggeri, M.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 903
  • [5] Life cycle sustainability assessment framework for water sector resource recovery solutions: Strengths and weaknesses
    Bhambhani, Anurag
    van der Hoek, Jan Peter
    Kapelan, Zoran
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2022, 180
  • [6] Sustainability assessment framework for integrated seawater desalination and resource recovery: A participatory approach
    Ktori, Rodoula
    Parada, Mar Palmeros
    Rodriguez-Pascual, Marcos
    van Loosdrecht, Mark C. M.
    Xevgenos, Dimitrios
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2025, 212
  • [7] Editorial: Resource Recovery From Waste
    Lag-Brotons, Alfonso J.
    Velenturf, Anne P. M.
    Crane, Richard
    Head, Ian M.
    Purnell, Phil
    Semple, Kirk T.
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2020, 8
  • [8] Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Hydrogen from Waste Polymers
    Salah, Cecilia
    Cobo, Selene
    Perez-Ramirez, Javier
    Guillen-Gosalbez, Gonzalo
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (08) : 3238 - 3247
  • [9] Municipal solid waste supply chain management under an integrated optimization of sustainability targets
    Saif, Yousef
    Griffiths, Steven
    Almansoori, Ali
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 160
  • [10] A decision -support framework for techno-economic-sustainability assessment of resource recovery alternatives
    Silk, Dominic
    Mazzali, Beatrice
    Gargalo, Carina L.
    Pinelo, Manuel
    Udugama, Isuru A.
    Mansouri, Seyed Soheil
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 266