Public attitudes towards sharing loyalty card data for academic health research: a qualitative study

被引:6
作者
Dolan, Elizabeth H. [1 ]
Shiells, Kate [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Goulding, James [1 ]
Skatova, Anya [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Univ Business Sch, N LAB, Si Yuan Bldg,Jubilee Campus, Nottingham NG8 1BB, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Med Res Council MRC, Integrat Epidemiol Unit, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Alan Turing Inst, London, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Attitudes; Cancer research; COVID-19; research; Health research; Loyalty card; Personal data; Qualitative; Safeguards;
D O I
10.1186/s12910-022-00795-8
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background A growing number of studies show the potential of loyalty card data for use in health research. However, research into public perceptions of using this data is limited. This study aimed to investigate public attitudes towards donating loyalty card data for academic health research, and the safeguards the public would want to see implemented. The way in which participant attitudes varied according to whether loyalty card data would be used for either cancer or COVID-19 research was also examined. Methods Participants (N = 40) were recruited via Prolific Academic to take part in semi-structured telephone interviews, with questions focused on data sharing related to either COVID-19 or ovarian/bowel cancer as the proposed health condition to be researched. Content analysis was used to identify sub-themes corresponding to the two a priori themes, attitudes and safeguards. Results Participant attitudes were found to fall into two categories, either rational or emotional. Under rational, most participants were in favour of sharing loyalty card data. Support of health research was seen as an important reason to donate such data, with loyalty card logs being considered as already within the public domain. With increased understanding of research purpose, participants expressed higher willingness to donate data. Within the emotional category, participants shared fears about revealing location information and of third parties obtaining their data. With regards to safeguards, participants described the importance of anonymisation and the level of data detail; the control, convenience and choice they desired in sharing data; and the need for transparency and data security. The change in hypothetical purpose of the data sharing, from Covid-19 to cancer research, had no impact on participants' decision to donate, although did affect their understanding of how loyalty card data could be used. Conclusions Based on interviews with the public, this study contributes recommendations for those researchers and the wider policy community seeking to obtain loyalty card data for health research. Whilst participants were largely in favour of donating loyalty card data for academic health research, information, choice and appropriate safeguards are all exposed as prerequisites upon which decisions are made.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Ada Lovelace Institute, 2020, now. Technical Report.
[2]   Large-scale and high-resolution analysis of food purchases and health outcomes [J].
Aiello, Luca Maria ;
Schifanella, Rossano ;
Quercia, Daniele ;
Del Prete, Lucia .
EPJ DATA SCIENCE, 2019, 8 (1)
[3]   Responsible Practices for Data Sharing [J].
Alter, George ;
Gonzalez, Richard .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2018, 73 (02) :146-156
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ON WAY MIRR PUBL ATT
[5]  
[Anonymous], US
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Understanding patient data secure data environment survey
[7]   Big Data and Public-Private Partnerships in Healthcare and Research: The Application of an Ethics Framework for Big Data in Health and Research [J].
Ballantyne, Angela ;
Stewart, Cameron .
ASIAN BIOETHICS REVIEW, 2019, 11 (03) :315-326
[8]   Dynamic Consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges of modern biomedical research [J].
Budin-Ljosne, Isabelle ;
Teare, Harriet J. A. ;
Kaye, Jane ;
Beck, Stephan ;
Bentzen, Heidi Beate ;
Caenazzo, Luciana ;
Collett, Clive ;
D'Abramo, Flavio ;
Felzmann, Heike ;
Finlay, Teresa ;
Javaid, Muhammad Kassim ;
Jones, Erica ;
Katic, Visnja ;
Simpson, Amy ;
Mascalzoni, Deborah .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2017, 18
[9]  
Byrom J., 2001, INT J RETAIL DISTRIB, V29, P333, DOI [10.1108/09590550110394234, DOI 10.1108/09590550110394234]
[10]  
Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation, 2021, UNL VAL DAT EXPL ROL