An evaluation framework for earthquake-responsive land administration

被引:16
|
作者
Mitchell, David [1 ]
Grant, Donald [2 ]
Roberge, Daniel [3 ]
Bhatta, Ganesh Prasad [4 ]
Caceres, Christian
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Sci, Geospatial Sci, GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] RMIT Univ, Sch Sci, Geospatial Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Deputy Ministers Off, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[4] Minist Land Reform & Management, Survey Dept, Kathmandu, Nepal
关键词
Earthquake; Risk; Response; Recovery; Reconstruction; Land administration; Land governance; Land information; Vulnerability; Preparedness; Mitigation; Evaluation framework; Haiti; Nepal; New Zealand;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.020
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In recent years earthquakes and their secondary hazards have claimed the largest number of lives of all large natural disasters. Some of the world's most earthquake-prone zones are also areas of high population density. The impact is magnified by vulnerability factors including non-enforcement of building codes, knowledge gaps, urban poverty and poor governance capacity to manage and reduce earthquake risks. Poor security of land tenure and property rights increases the vulnerability of people and affects their ability to respond to natural disasters. Earthquake recovery and reconstruction provides very significant challenges for land agencies, with these challenges differing from one country to the next due to differences in the local context. Drawing on contrasting case studies in Haiti, Nepal and New Zealand this paper identifies the common post-earthquake land administration functions and challenges that may apply to many contexts. These lessons provide land agencies and other key stakeholders with a summary of the challenges an earthquake poses for land administration at different post disaster stages. We also discuss the policy and regulatory, institutional, operational and preparedness lessons for land administration. From these lessons we propose a framework for evaluating the earthquake-responsiveness of a land administration system. This framework can be used by a land agency in an earthquake prone region, or where an earthquake has recently occurred, to assess what challenges to land administration might occur in the event of an earthquake, and the preparedness of their land administration system.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 252
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Community resilience framework for an earthquake prone area in Baluchistan
    Ainuddin, Syed
    Routray, Jayant Kumar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2012, 2 : 25 - 36
  • [2] A conceptual framework for utilising VGI in land administration
    Rahmatizadeh, Shima
    Rajabifard, Abbas
    Kalantari, Mohsen
    LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 56 : 81 - 89
  • [3] Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration and the Framework for Effective Land Administration: Synthesis of Contemporary Experiences
    Metaferia, Mekonnen Tesfaye
    Bennett, Rohan Mark
    Alemie, Berhanu Kefale
    Koeva, Mila
    LAND, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [4] Alignment of the legal and institutional framework of Ekiti state land administration against the fit-for-purpose land administration framework principles
    Babalola, Kehinde Hassan
    Hull, Simon
    Whittal, Jennifer
    SURVEY REVIEW, 2025,
  • [5] Urban disaster recovery: a measurement framework and its application to the 1995 Kobe earthquake
    Chang, Stephanie E.
    DISASTERS, 2010, 34 (02) : 303 - 327
  • [6] An evaluation framework for land readjustment practices
    Yilmaz, Ahmet
    Cagdas, Volkan
    Demir, Hulya
    LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 44 : 153 - 168
  • [7] Using a Gender-Responsive Land Rights Framework to Assess Youth Land Rights in Rural Liberia
    Louis, Elizabeth
    Mauto, Tizai
    Dodd, My-Lan
    Heidenrich, Tasha
    Dolo, Peter
    Urey, Emmanuel
    LAND, 2020, 9 (08)
  • [8] A measurement framework of community recovery to earthquake: a Wenchuan Earthquake case study
    Liu, Jie
    Lu, Di
    Wang, Yong-liang
    Shi, Zhen-wu
    JOURNAL OF HOUSING AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 33 (04) : 877 - 892
  • [9] A framework for selecting a fit-for-purpose data collection method in land administration
    Rahrnatizadeh, Shima
    Rajabifard, Abbas
    Kalantari, Mohsen
    Ho, Serene
    LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 70 : 162 - 171
  • [10] All for one and one for all? Exploring the nexus of land administration, land management and land governance
    Hull, Simon Antony
    LAND USE POLICY, 2024, 144