Validation of intensity attenuation relationships

被引:20
作者
Albarello, D [1 ]
D'Amico, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siena, Dept Earth Sci, I-53100 Siena, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1785/0120040062
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
A new approach is proposed for the empirical validation of intensity attenuation relationships to be implemented in standard procedure devoted to probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA). To this purpose, the overall number of documented intensities above a given threshold in the area of interest is compared with the one expected on the basis of the considered attenuation relationship. By using this methodology, the reliability of empirical relationships can be analyzed by also taking into account the uncertainty affecting ill-defined intensity attributions both at the epicenter and at the site. To assess the feasibility of this procedure, an attenuation relationship recently proposed for the Italian region has been evaluated by considering felt intensities documented in the area during the past two centuries. Although the macroseismic database considered for validation is the same used for the parameterization of the investigated relationship, important discrepancies have been detected between observed and computed intensities in the range of values significant for seismic hazard. This result indicates that a careful parameterization of attenuation relationships in their complete probabilistic form is mandatory when such relationships have to be implemented in PSHA procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 724
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   The role of data processing and uncertainty management in seismic hazard evaluations: Insights from estimates in the Garfagnana-Lunigiana area (Northern Italy) [J].
D'Amico, V ;
Albarello, D .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2003, 29 (01) :77-95
[12]   The attenuation of seismic intensity in Italy: A bilinear shape indicates the dominance of deep phases at epicentral distances longer than 45 km [J].
Gasperini, P .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 91 (04) :826-841
[13]  
Giardini D, 1993, ANN GEOFIS, V36, P3
[14]   A proposal for comparing the reliabilities of alternative seismic hazard models [J].
Grandori, G ;
Guagenti, E ;
Tagliani, A .
JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 1998, 2 (01) :27-35
[15]  
GUPTA IN, 1976, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V66, P743
[16]  
HOWELL BF, 1975, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V65, P651
[17]   Probabilistic forecasting of earthquakes [J].
Kagan, YY ;
Jackson, DD .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 143 (02) :438-453
[18]  
Karnik V., 1969, Seismicity of the European area, V1
[19]   ESTIMATES OF SITE SEISMICITY RATES USING ILL-DEFINED MACROSEISMIC DATA [J].
MAGRI, L ;
MUCCIARELLI, M ;
ALBARELLO, D .
PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1994, 143 (04) :617-632
[20]  
MCGUIRE RK, 1981, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V71, P321