Trial of an Electronic Decision Support System to Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Community Mental Health

被引:0
作者
Woltmann, Emily M. [1 ,2 ]
Wilkniss, Sandra M. [3 ]
Teachout, Alexandra [3 ]
McHugo, Gregory J. [4 ]
Drake, Robert E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Serious Mental Illness Treatment Res & Evaluat Ct, Ann Arbor Dept Vet Affairs, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychiat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Thresholds Psychiat Rehabil Ctr, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Dartmouth Med Sch, Dartmouth Psychiat Res Cente & Dept Psychiat, Lebanon, NH USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; CAMBERWELL ASSESSMENT; CARE; NEEDS; PERSPECTIVES; CONSUMERS; TURNOVER; ILLNESS; STAFF;
D O I
10.1176/appi.ps.62.1.54
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Involvement of community mental health consumers in mental health decision making has been consistently associated with improvements in health outcomes. Electronic decision support systems (EDSSs) that support both consumer and provider decision making may be a sustainable way to improve dyadic communication in a field with approximately 50% workforce turnover per year. This study examined the feasibility of such a system and investigated proximal outcomes of the system's performance. Methods: A cluster randomized design was used to evaluate an EDSS at three urban community mental health sites. Case managers (N=20) were randomly assigned to the EDSS-supported planning group or to the usual care planning group. Consumers (N=80) were assigned to the same group as their case managers. User satisfaction with the care planning process was assessed for consumers and case managers (possible scores range from 1 to 5, with higher summary scores indicating more satisfaction). Recall of the care plan was assessed for consumers. Linear regression with adjustment for grouping by worker was used to assess satisfaction scores. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to examine knowledge of the care plan. Results: Compared with case managers in the control group, those in the intervention group were significantly more satisfied with the care planning process (mean +/- SD score=4.0 +/-.5 versus 3.3 +/-.5; adjusted p=.01). Compared with consumers in the control group, those in the intervention group had significantly greater recall of their care plans three days after the planning session (mean proportion of plan goals recalled=75%+/- 28% versus 57%+/- 32%; p=.02). There were no differences between the clients in the intervention and control groups regarding satisfaction. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that clients can build their own care plans and negotiate and revise them with their case managers using an EDSS. (Psychiatric Services 62:54-60, 2011)
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 60
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Shared decision-making preferences of people with severe mental illness [J].
Adams, Jared R. ;
Drake, Robert E. ;
Wolford, George L. .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2007, 58 (09) :1219-1221
[2]  
[Anonymous], EXPT QUASI EXPT DESI
[3]  
[Anonymous], IMPR QUAL HLTH CAR M
[4]  
[Anonymous], EFFECTIVE CLIN PRACT
[5]   Antecedents to retention and turnover among child welfare, social work, and other human service employees: What can we learn from past research? A review and metanalysis [J].
Barak, MEM ;
Nissly, JA ;
Levin, A .
SOCIAL SERVICE REVIEW, 2001, 75 (04) :625-661
[6]   Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature: Two bibliometric surveys [J].
Bland J.M. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4 (1)
[7]   Implementing supported employment as an evidence-based practice [J].
Bond, GR ;
Becker, DR ;
Drake, RE ;
Rapp, CA ;
Meisler, N ;
Lehman, AF ;
Bell, MD ;
Blyler, CR .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2001, 52 (03) :313-322
[8]  
Buchbinder SB, 1999, AM J MANAG CARE, V5, P1431
[9]   CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials [J].
Campbell, MK ;
Elbourne, DR ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7441) :702-708
[10]   Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (05) :651-661