Epidural spinal cord stimulation with a multiple electrode paddle lead is effective in treating intractable low back pain

被引:104
作者
Barolat, G
Oakley, JC
Law, JD
North, RB
Ketcik, B
Sharan, A
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Yellowstone Neurosurg Associates, Yellowstone Med Ctr E, Billings, MT USA
[3] Rocky Mt Neurosurg Alliance, Aurora, CO USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD USA
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2001年 / 4卷 / 02期
关键词
low back pain; paddle electrodes; pain relief; spinal cord stimulation; VAS;
D O I
10.1046/j.1525-1403.2001.00059.x
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The objective of this paper is to examine the outcomes of patients with intractable low-back pain treated with epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) utilizing paddle electrodes and a radio frequency (RF) stimulator. A multicenter prospective study was performed to collect data from patients suffering from chronic low-back pain. The study was designed to collect data from 60 patients at four centers and examine their outcomes at, or up to two years post implantation. Patients' participation included written responses to a series of preoperative questionnaires that were designed to collect previous surgical history information, leg and low back pain characteristics, and routine demographic information. Outcome measurements included the visual analog scale (VAS),the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire,the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), and a patient satisfaction rating scale. Data were collected at each site during patient visits or by mail, at approximately six months, 12 months, and 24 months. A total of 44 patients have been implanted with a SCS system at the time of this writing. Follow-up data were available for 41 patients. Preoperatively, all patients reported more than 50% of their pain in the low back. All patients had pain in both their backs and legs. All patients showed a reported mean decrease in their 10-point VAS scores compared to baseline. The majority of patients reported fair to excellent pain relief in both the low back and legs. At six months 91.6% of the patients reported fair to excellent relief in the legs and 82.7% of the patients reported fair to excellent relief in the low back. At one year 88.2% of the patients reported fair to excellent relief in the legs and 68.8% of the patients reported fair to excellent relief in the low back. Significant improvement in function and quality of life was found at both the six-month and one-year follow-ups using the Oswestry and SIP, respectively. The majority of patients reported that the procedure was worthwhile (92% at six months, 88% at one year). No patient indicated that the procedure was not worthwhile. We conclude that SCS proved beneficial at one year for the treatment of patients with chronic low back and leg pain.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 66
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Subcutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation With Paddle Lead for Treatment of Low Back Pain: Case Report
    Ordia, Joe
    Vaisman, Julien
    NEUROMODULATION, 2009, 12 (03): : 205 - 209
  • [22] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Intractable Pain Following Limb Amputation
    McAuley, John
    van Groeningen, Richard
    Green, Christopher
    NEUROMODULATION, 2013, 16 (06): : 530 - 536
  • [23] Spinal cord stimulation for intractable vulvar pain - A case report
    Whiteside, JL
    Walters, MD
    Mekhail, N
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 48 (10) : 821 - 823
  • [24] Spinal Cord Stimulation to Treat Low Back Pain in Patients With and Without Previous Spine Surgery
    Campwala, Zahabiya
    Datta, Pallavi
    DiMarzio, Marisa
    Sukul, Vishad
    Feustel, Paul J.
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2021, 24 (08): : 1363 - 1369
  • [25] Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation Waveforms for Treating Chronic Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Karri, Jay
    Orhurhu, Vwaire
    Wahezi, Sayed
    Tang, Tuan
    Deer, Timothy
    Abd-Elsayed, Alaa
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2020, 23 (05) : 451 - 460
  • [26] Paddle lead cervical spinal cord stimulation for failed neck surgery syndrome
    Chivukula, Srinivas
    Tomycz, Nestor D.
    Moossy, John J.
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 115 (10) : 2254 - 2256
  • [27] Surgical Paddle-Lead Placement for Screening Trials of Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Pahapill, Peter A.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2014, 17 (04): : 346 - 348
  • [28] Sacral nerve and spinal cord stimulation for intractable neuropathic pain caused by spinal cord infarction
    Kim, Sung Ho
    Kim, Seong Ho
    Kim, Sang Woo
    Jang, Sung Ho
    NEUROMODULATION, 2007, 10 (04): : 369 - 372
  • [29] Is Spinal Cord Stimulation an Effective Treatment Option for Discogenic Pain?
    Vallejo, Ricardo
    Zevallos, L. Manuel
    Lowe, Jessica
    Benyamin, Ramsin
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2012, 12 (03) : 194 - 201
  • [30] INTRACTABLE CENTRAL PAIN IN SPINAL-CORD INJURY IS NOT RELIEVED BY SPINAL-CORD STIMULATION
    COLE, JD
    ILLIS, LS
    SEDGWICK, EM
    PARAPLEGIA, 1991, 29 (03): : 167 - 172