Decreased use of adjuvant breast cancer therapy in a randomized controlled trial of a decision aid with individualized risk information

被引:83
作者
Peele, PB
Siminoff, LA
Xu, Y
Ravdin, PM
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Dept Bioeth, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med, San Antonio, TX 78284 USA
关键词
decision aid; cancer; decision making; information preferences;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X05276851
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. Oncology patients often seek involvement in their medical consultations. Such involvement is endorsed by most health care providers and mirrored in practice guidelines. However, oncologists exhibit great variation in how they provide patients with disease-relevant information, and many remain reluctant to do so at all. The authors examined the impact of a patient-specific decision aid on women's decisions about adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Method. 386 women with breast cancer were randomized to receive either an informational pamphlet about adjuvant therapy (usual care) or a patient-specific, evidence-based decision aid about adjuvant therapy. The authors compared rates of adjuvant therapy between the groups controlling for age, education, marital status, race, tumor severity, and practice type of their physician (university-based or community-based). Results. Among women with low tumor severity, only 58% (35/60) of women in the decision aid group chose adjuvant therapy, compared to 87% (33/38) of their counterparts in usual care (P < 0.01). Conclusions. This study illustrates the important impact of medical decision aids on treatment choices, particularly for patients for whom treatment has little benefit. In the case of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, providing individualized, evidence-based risk information for shared decision making resulted in fewer women with low tumor severity choosing adjuvant treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 307
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
BERTAKIS KD, 1991, J FAM PRACTICE, V32, P175
[2]   Statistics notes - The odds ratio [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7247) :1468-1468
[3]   EFFECTS OF PATIENT EDUCATION ON DECISIONS ABOUT BREAST-CANCER TREATMENTS - A PRELIMINARY-REPORT [J].
CHAPMAN, GB ;
ELSTEIN, AS ;
HUGHES, KK .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1995, 15 (03) :231-239
[4]   Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (05) :651-661
[5]   When can odds ratios mislead? [J].
Davies, HTO ;
Crombie, IK ;
Tavakoli, M .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7136) :989-991
[6]   INVOLVING PATIENTS IN COMPLEX DECISIONS ABOUT THEIR CARE - AN APPROACH USING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
DOLAN, JG ;
BORDLEY, DR .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 8 (04) :204-209
[7]  
Feldman-Stewart Deb, 2000, Health Expect, V3, P46, DOI 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00082.x
[8]  
GRADY D, 1992, ANN INTERN MED, V117, P1038
[9]   Improving informed consent - Insights from behavioral decision research [J].
Holmes-Rovner, M ;
Wills, CE .
MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (09) :30-38
[10]   A BEDSIDE DECISION INSTRUMENT TO ELICIT A PATIENTS PREFERENCE CONCERNING ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
LEVINE, MN ;
GAFNI, A ;
MARKHAM, B ;
MACFARLANE, D .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 117 (01) :53-58