Diagnostic accuracy for macroscopic classification of nodular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and angiography-assisted computed tomography

被引:20
作者
Tada, Toshifumi [1 ]
Kumada, Takashi [1 ]
Toyoda, Hidenori [1 ]
Ito, Takanori [1 ]
Sone, Yasuhiro [2 ]
Okuda, Seiji [3 ]
Ogawa, Sadanobu [4 ]
Igura, Takumi [5 ]
Imai, Yasuharu [5 ]
机构
[1] Ogaki Municipal Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Ogaki, Gifu 5038502, Japan
[2] Ogaki Municipal Hosp, Dept Radiol, Ogaki, Gifu 5038502, Japan
[3] Ogaki Municipal Hosp, Dept Pathol Diag, Ogaki, Gifu 5038502, Japan
[4] Ogaki Municipal Hosp, Dept Imaging Diag, Ogaki, Gifu 5038502, Japan
[5] Ikeda Municipal Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Ikeda, Osaka, Japan
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Macroscopic findings; Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; Angiography-assisted computed tomography; GD-EOB-DTPA; FOCAL LIVER-LESIONS; CONTRAST AGENT; INTRAARTERIAL INJECTION; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; CRITICAL-APPRAISAL; RISK-FACTORS; RESECTION; SURVIVAL; PHASE;
D O I
10.1007/s00535-014-0947-x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The macroscopic type of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a predictor of prognosis. We clarified the diagnostic value of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the macroscopic classification of nodular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as compared to angiography-assisted computed tomography (CT). A total of 71 surgically resected nodular HCCs with a maximum diameter of a parts per thousand currency sign5 cm were investigated. HCCs were evaluated preoperatively using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and angiography-assisted CT. HCCs were pathologically classified as simple nodular (SN), SN with extranodular growth (SN-EG), or confluent multinodular (CMN). SN-EG and CMN were grouped as non-SN. Five readers independently reviewed the images using a five-point scale. We examined the accuracy of both imaging modalities in differentiating between SN and non-SN HCC. Overall, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A (z) ) for the diagnosis of non-SN did not differ between Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and angiography-assisted CT [0.879 (95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.779-0.937) and 0.845 (95 % CI, 0.723-0.919), respectively]. For HCCs > 2 cm, the A (z) for Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI was greater than 0.9. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for identifying non-SN were equal to or higher than values with angiography-assisted CT in all three categories (all tumors, a parts per thousand currency sign2 cm, and > 2 cm), but the differences were not statistically significant. Using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI to assess the macroscopic findings in nodular HCC was equal or superior to using angiography-assisted CT.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 94
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves [J].
Akobeng, Anthony K. .
ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2007, 96 (05) :644-647
[2]   A non-smooth tumor margin in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging predicts microscopic portal vein invasion, intrahepatic metastasis, and early recurrence after hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma [J].
Ariizumi, Shun-ichi ;
Kitagawa, Koichi ;
Kotera, Yoshihito ;
Takahashi, Yutaka ;
Katagiri, Satoshi ;
Kuwatsuru, Ryohei ;
Yamamoto, Masakazu .
JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2011, 18 (04) :575-585
[3]   Efficacy and safety of MR imaging with liver-specific contrast agent: US Multicenter Phase III study [J].
Bluemke, DA ;
Sahani, D ;
Amendola, M ;
Balzer, T ;
Breuer, J ;
Brown, JJ ;
Casalino, DD ;
Davis, PL ;
Francis, IR ;
Krinsky, G ;
Lee, FT ;
Lu, D ;
Paulson, EK ;
Schwartz, LH ;
Siegelman, ES .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (01) :89-98
[4]   Predictor for Histological Microvascular Invasion of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Lesson from 229 Consecutive Cases of Curative Liver Resection [J].
Eguchi, Susumu ;
Takatsuki, Mitsuhisa ;
Hidaka, Masaaki ;
Soyama, Akihiko ;
Tomonaga, Tetsuo ;
Muraoka, Izumi ;
Kanematsu, Takashi .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 34 (05) :1034-1038
[5]   Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in USA [J].
El-Serag, Hashem B. .
HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2007, 37 :S88-S94
[6]   Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cirrhotic Liver Enhancement Using Gd-EOB-DTPA [J].
Frericks, Bernd B. ;
Loddenkemper, Christoph ;
Huppertz, Alexander ;
Valdeig, Steffi ;
Stroux, Andrea ;
Seja, Marion ;
Wolf, Karl-Juergen ;
Albrecht, Thomas .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (04) :1053-1060
[7]   Prediction of macroscopic findings of hepatocellular carcinoma on hepatobiliary phase of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Correlation with pathology [J].
Fujinaga, Yasunari ;
Kadoya, Masumi ;
Kozaka, Kazuto ;
Shinmura, Rieko ;
Matsui, Osamu ;
Takayama, Tadatoshi ;
Yamamoto, Masakazu ;
Kokudo, Norihiro ;
Kawasaki, Seiji ;
Arii, Shigeki .
HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2013, 43 (05) :488-494
[8]   Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotics and noncirrhotics. Evaluation of clinicopathologic features and comparison of risk factors for long-term survival and tumour recurrence in a single centre [J].
Grazi, GL ;
Cescon, M ;
Ravaioli, M ;
Ercolani, G ;
Gardini, A ;
Del Gaudio, M ;
Vetrone, G ;
Cavallari, A .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 17 :119-129
[9]   PHASE-I CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF GD-EOB-DTPA AS A HEPATOBILIARY MR CONTRAST AGENT - SAFETY, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND MR-IMAGING [J].
HAMM, B ;
STAKS, T ;
MUHLER, A ;
BOLLOW, M ;
TAUPITZ, M ;
FRENZEL, T ;
WOLF, KJ ;
WEINMANN, HJ ;
LANGE, L .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (03) :785-792
[10]   Progression to hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: Correlation with intranodular blood supply evaluated with CT during Intraarterial injection of contrast material [J].
Hayashi, M ;
Matsui, O ;
Ueda, K ;
Kawamori, Y ;
Gabata, T ;
Kadoya, M .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (01) :143-149