EFFICIENT FEATURE SELECTION FOR POLYP DETECTION

被引:0
作者
Seghouane, Abd-Krim [1 ]
Ong, Ju Lynn [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Engn & Comp Sci, Natl ICT Australia, Canberra Res Lab, Canberra, ACT, Australia
来源
2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING | 2010年
关键词
feature selection; computed tomography (CT); support vector classifier; mutual information; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; CT COLONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1109/ICIP.2010.5648923
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a promising alternative to traditional invasive colonoscopic methods used in the detection and removal of cancerous growths, or polyps in the colon. Existing algorithms for CTC typically use a classifier to discriminate between true and false positives generated by a polyp candidate detection system. However, these classifiers often suffer from a phenomenon termed the curse of dimensionality, whereby there is a marked degradation in the performance of a classifier as the number of features used in the classifier is increased. In addition an increase in the number of features used also contributes to an increase in computational complexity and demands on storage space. This paper demonstrates the benefits of feature selection with the aim at increasing specificity while preserving sensitivity in a polyp detection system. It also compares the performances of an individual (F-score) and mutual information (MI) method for feature selection on a polyp candidate database, in order to select a subset of features for optimum CAD performance. Experimental results show that the performance of SVM+MI seems to be better for a small number of features used, but the SVM+Fscore method seems to dominate when using the 30-50 best ranked features. On the whole, the AUC measures are able to reach 0.8-0.85 for the top ranked 20-40 features using MI or F-score methods compared with 0.65-0.7 when using all 100 features in the worstcase scenario.
引用
收藏
页码:2285 / 2288
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], FEATURE EXTRACTION F
[2]   USING MUTUAL INFORMATION FOR SELECTING FEATURES IN SUPERVISED NEURAL-NET LEARNING [J].
BATTITI, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 1994, 5 (04) :537-550
[3]  
Gokturk S., 2009, IEEE T MED IMAG
[4]   A statistical 3-D pattern processing method for computer-aided detection of polyps in CT colonography [J].
Göktürk, SB ;
Tomasi, C ;
Acar, B ;
Beaulieu, CF ;
Paik, DS ;
Jeffrey, RB ;
Yee, J ;
Napel, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2001, 20 (12) :1251-1260
[5]  
Jerebko A., 2006, P MED IM COMP COMP A, P169
[6]  
Mantaras R.L.D., 1991, MACH LEARN, V6, P81
[7]  
Ong JL, 2008, I S BIOMED IMAGING, P636
[8]   Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: Feasibility study [J].
Summers, RM ;
Beaulieu, CF ;
Pusanik, LM ;
Malley, JD ;
Jeffrey, RB ;
Glazer, DI ;
Napel, S .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (01) :284-290
[9]   Massive-training artificial neural network (MTANN) for reduction of false positives in computer-aided detection of polyps: Suppression of rectal tubes [J].
Suzuki, Kenji ;
Yoshida, Hiroyuki ;
Nappi, Janne ;
Dachman, Abraham H. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (10) :3814-3824
[10]  
Vapnik V., 1995, The nature of statistical learning theory