Mode-I debonding of a double cantilever beam: A comparison between cohesive crack modeling and Finite Fracture Mechanics

被引:36
作者
Dimitri, R. [1 ]
Cornetti, P. [2 ]
Mantic, V. [3 ]
Trullo, M. [1 ]
De Lorenzis, L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salento, Dept Innovat Engn, Via Monteroni, I-73100 Lecce, Italy
[2] Politecn Torino, Dept Struct Bldg & Geotech Engn, Turin, Italy
[3] Univ Seville, Sch Engn, Grp Elast & Strength Mat, Camino Descubrimientos S-N, Seville 41092, Spain
[4] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Angew Mech, Bienroder Weg 87, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Adhesive interface; Cohesive zone modeling; Double cantilever beam; Finite Fracture Mechanics; Linear elastic fracture mechanics; ZONE MODELS; PLATED BEAMS; COMPOSITE-MATERIALS; FIBER COMPOSITES; ELEMENT-METHOD; THIN ADHESIVE; INTERFACE; SPECIMENS; TOUGHNESS; DELAMINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.06.007
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
In this paper we focus on the prediction of mode-I debonding for a double cantilever beam (DCB). Among the various modeling approaches available, the Cohesive Crack Model (CCM) and Finite Fracture Mechanics (FFM) are selected for the analytical investigation, due to their ability to reconcile the stress- and energy-based approaches. The specimen is considered as an assemblage of two identical beams partly bonded together by an initially elastic interface. After the elastic stage, according to the CCM approach, it is assumed that, ahead of the physical crack tip, there exists a cohesive zone where the interface behavior is described by a stress-separation law. The interfacial stresses and length of the process zone are determined in closed form, along with the global load-displacement response. The method is first compared to the simple beam theory (SBT) and the enhanced beam theory (EBT) approaches, which are found to provide larger values of the debonding load; the difference between predictions of CCM and SBT/EBT is more pronounced for less brittle interfaces, i.e. for larger process zones. Then the analytical solution obtained by means of FFM is presented, which, despite being simply based on the elastic foundation model, closely matches the CCM results. Finally a numerical solution is achieved by a finite element analysis where generalized zero-thickness contact interface elements are adopted. An excellent agreement with these results confirms the good performance of the proposed CCM and FFM approaches. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 72
页数:16
相关论文
共 81 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Standard test method for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites
[3]  
Barenblatt G., 1959, APPL MATH MECH-ENGL, V23, P622, DOI 10.1016/0021-8928(59)90157-1
[4]  
Barenblatt G.I., 1962, The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture, V7, P55, DOI [10.1016/S0065-2156, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2156, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2]
[5]   EXPERIMENTS ON CONTROLLED FRACTURES [J].
BENBOW, JJ ;
ROESLER, FC .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE PHYSICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SECTION B, 1957, 70 (02) :201-&
[6]   An enhanced beam-theory model of the asymmetric double cantilever beam (ADCB) test for composite laminates [J].
Bennati, Stefano ;
Colleluori, Massimiliano ;
Corigliano, Domenico ;
Valvo, Paolo S. .
COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 69 (11-12) :1735-1745
[7]   Imperfect soft and stiff interfaces in two-dimensional elasticity [J].
Benveniste, Y ;
Miloh, T .
MECHANICS OF MATERIALS, 2001, 33 (06) :309-323
[8]   Simulation of finite-width process zone in concrete-like materials by means of a regularized extended finite element model [J].
Benvenuti, Elena ;
Tralli, Antonio .
COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2012, 50 (04) :479-497
[9]   The use of a cohesive zone model to study the fracture of fibre composites and adhesively-bonded joints [J].
Blackman, BRK ;
Hadavinia, H ;
Kinloch, AJ ;
Williams, JG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 2003, 119 (01) :25-46
[10]   A status report on delamination resistance testing of polymer-matrix composites [J].
Brunner, A. J. ;
Blackman, B. R. K. ;
Davies, P. .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2008, 75 (09) :2779-2794