Consumer and clinician perspectives on personalising breast cancer prevention information

被引:24
作者
Keogh, L. A. [1 ]
Steel, E. [1 ]
Weideman, P. [2 ,9 ]
Butow, P. [3 ,4 ]
Collins, I. M. [2 ,5 ]
Emery, J. D. [6 ]
Mann, G. B. [7 ,8 ]
Bickerstaffe, A. [9 ]
Trainer, A. H. [2 ,10 ]
Hopper, L. J. [9 ]
Phillips, K. A. [2 ,9 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth Equ, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Ctr Med Psychol & Evidence Based Decis Making CeM, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Psychooncol Cooperat Res Grp PoCoG, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Deakin Univ, Greater Green Triangle Clin Sch, Sch Med, Warrnambool, Australia
[6] Univ Melbourne, Dept Gen Practice, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Royal Melbourne & Royal Womens Hosp, Breast Serv, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] Univ Melbourne, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Epidemiol & Biostat, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[10] Univ Melbourne, Dept Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[11] Univ Melbourne, Sir Peter MacCallum Dept Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Breast cancer prevention; Risk management; Online risk assessment; Focus groups; Clinician perspectives; Consumer perspectives; RISK; CARE; SUSCEPTIBILITY; GENOMICS; WOMEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2018.11.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Personalised prevention of breast cancer has focused on women at very high risk, yet most breast cancers occur in women at average, or moderately increased risk ( <= moderate risk). Objectives: To determine; 1) interest of women at <= moderate risk (consumers) in personalised information about breast cancer risk; 2) familial cancer clinicians' (FCCs) perspective on managing women at <= moderate risk, and; 3) both consumers' and FCCs reactions to iPrevent, a personalised breast cancer risk assessment and risk management decision support tool. Methods: Seven focus groups on breast cancer risk were conducted with 49 participants; 27 consumers and 22 FCCs. Data were analysed thematically. Results: Consumers reported some misconceptions, low trust in primary care practitioners for breast cancer prevention advice and frustration that they often lacked tailored advice about breast cancer risk. They expressed interest in receiving personalised risk information using iPrevent. FCCs reported an inadequate workforce to advise women at <= moderate risk and reacted positively to the potential of iPrevent to assist. Conclusions: While highlighting a potential role for iPrevent, several outstanding issues remain. For personalised prevention of breast cancer to extend beyond women at high risk, we must harness women's interest in receiving tailored information about breast cancer prevention and identify a workforce willing to advise women. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 47
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J PREVENTIVE MED HYG
[2]   The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers: updates and extensions [J].
Antoniou, A. C. ;
Cunningham, A. P. ;
Peto, J. ;
Evans, D. G. ;
Lalloo, F. ;
Narod, S. A. ;
Risch, H. A. ;
Eyfjord, J. E. ;
Hopper, J. L. ;
Southey, M. C. ;
Olsson, H. ;
Johannsson, O. ;
Borg, A. ;
Passini, B. ;
Radice, P. ;
Manoukian, S. ;
Eccles, D. M. ;
Tang, N. ;
Olah, E. ;
Anton-Culver, H. ;
Warner, E. ;
Lubinski, J. ;
Gronwald, J. ;
Gorski, B. ;
Tryggvadottir, L. ;
Syrjakoski, K. ;
Kallioniemi, O-P ;
Eerola, H. ;
Nevanlinna, H. ;
Pharoah, P. D. P. ;
Easton, D. F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 98 (08) :1457-1466
[3]   BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes [J].
Berry, DA ;
Iversen, ES ;
Gudbjartsson, DF ;
Hiller, EH ;
Garber, JE ;
Peshkin, BN ;
Lerman, C ;
Watson, P ;
Lynch, HT ;
Hilsenbeck, SG ;
Rubinstein, WS ;
Hughes, KS ;
Parmigiani, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (11) :2701-2712
[4]   The evolution of worry after breast cancer risk assessment: 6-year follow-up of the TRACE study cohort [J].
Brain, K. ;
Parsons, E. ;
Bennett, P. ;
Cannings-John, R. ;
Hood, K. .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2011, 20 (09) :984-991
[5]   Genetic Assessment of Breast Cancer Risk in Primary Care Practice [J].
Burke, Wylie ;
Culver, Julie ;
Pinsky, Linda ;
Hall, Sarah ;
Reynolds, Susan E. ;
Yasui, Yutaka ;
Press, Nancy .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2009, 149A (03) :349-356
[6]  
Cancer Australia, 2015, ADV FAM ASP BREAST C
[7]  
Cancer Australia, 2010, ADV FAM ASP BREAST C, Vthird
[8]   Incorporating genomics into breast and prostate cancer screening: assessing the implications [J].
Chowdhury, Susmita ;
Dent, Tom ;
Pashayan, Nora ;
Hall, Alison ;
Lyratzopoulos, Georgios ;
Hallowell, Nina ;
Hall, Per ;
Pharoah, Paul ;
Burton, Hilary .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 15 (06) :423-432
[9]   iPrevent®: a tailored, web-based, decision support tool for breast cancer risk assessment and management [J].
Collins, Ian M. ;
Bickerstaffe, Adrian ;
Ranaweera, Thilina ;
Maddumarachchi, Sanjaya ;
Keogh, Louise ;
Emery, Jon ;
Mann, G. Bruce ;
Butow, Phyllis ;
Weideman, Prue ;
Steel, Emma ;
Trainer, Alison ;
Bressel, Mathias ;
Hopper, John L. ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Antoniou, Antonis C. ;
Phillips, Kelly-Anne .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 156 (01) :171-182
[10]   Assessing and managing breast cancer risk: Clinicians' current practice and future needs [J].
Collins, Ian M. ;
Steel, Emma ;
Mann, G. Bruce ;
Emery, Jon D. ;
Bickerstaffe, Adrian ;
Trainer, Alison ;
Butow, Phyllis ;
Pirotta, Marie ;
Antoniou, Antonis C. ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Hopper, John ;
Phillips, Kelly-Anne ;
Keogh, Louise A. .
BREAST, 2014, 23 (05) :644-650