Is it possible to increase hit rates in structure-based virtual screening by pharmacophore filtering?: An investigation of the advantages and pitfalls of post-filtering

被引:54
作者
Muthas, Daniel [1 ]
Sabnis, Yogesh A. [1 ]
Lundborg, Magnus [1 ]
Karlen, Anders [1 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Chem, Div Organ Pharmaceut Chem, BMC, SE-75123 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Flo(+); surflex; FRED; enrichment factor; docking performance; structure-based virtual screening; pharmacophore filtering;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmgm.2007.11.005
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We have investigated the influence of post-filtering virtual screening results, with pharmacophorie features generated from an X-ray structure, on enrichment rates. This was performed using three docking softwares, zdock+, Surflex and FRED,as virtual screening tools and pharmacophores generated in UNITY from co-crystallized complexes. Sets of known actives along with 9997 pharmaceutically relevant decoy compounds were docked against six chemically diverse protein tat-gets namely CDK2, COX2, ER alpha, fX alpha, MMP3, and NA. To try to overcome the inherent limitations of the well-known docking problem, we generated multiple poses for each compound. The compounds were first ranked according to their scores alone and enrichment rates were calculated using only the top scoring pose of each compound. Subsequently, all poses for each compound were passed through the different pharmacoph ores generated from co-crystallized complexes and the enrichment factors were re-calculated based on the top-scoring passing pose of each Compound. Post-filtering with a pharmacophore generated from only one X-ray complex was shown to increase enrichment rates in all investigated targets compared to docking alone. This indicates that this is a general method, which works for diverse targets and different docking softwares. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1237 / 1251
页数:15
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [21] Surflex: Fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine
    Jain, AN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 46 (04) : 499 - 511
  • [22] Target-biased scoring approaches and expert systems in structure-based virtual screening
    Jansen, JM
    Martin, EJ
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2004, 8 (04) : 359 - 364
  • [23] Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids
    Jorgensen, WL
    Maxwell, DS
    TiradoRives, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1996, 118 (45) : 11225 - 11236
  • [24] Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy
    Kellenberger, E
    Rodrigo, J
    Muller, P
    Rognan, D
    [J]. PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 57 (02) : 225 - 242
  • [25] Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: Methods and applications
    Kitchen, DB
    Decornez, H
    Furr, JR
    Bajorath, J
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2004, 3 (11) : 935 - 949
  • [26] Virtual ligand screening: strategies, perspectives and limitations
    Klebe, Gerhard
    [J]. DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2006, 11 (13-14) : 580 - 594
  • [27] Evaluation of docking performance: Comparative data on docking algorithms
    Kontoyianni, M
    McClellan, LM
    Sokol, GS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 47 (03) : 558 - 565
  • [28] Structural basis for selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 by anti-inflammatory agents
    Kurumbail, RG
    Stevens, AM
    Gierse, JK
    McDonald, JJ
    Stegeman, RA
    Pak, JY
    Gildehaus, D
    Miyashiro, JM
    Penning, TD
    Seibert, K
    Isakson, PC
    Stallings, WC
    [J]. NATURE, 1996, 384 (6610) : 644 - 648
  • [29] Virtual screening: An effective tool for lead structure discovery?
    Langer, T
    Hoffmann, RD
    [J]. CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2001, 7 (07) : 509 - 527
  • [30] *LIGPR, SCHR LLC