Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock

被引:48
作者
Cleves, Ann E. [1 ]
Jain, Ajay N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehens Canc Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Bioengn & Therapeut Sci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
Docking; Protein flexibility; Surflex; Molecular similarity; Data fusion; Pose prediction; POSE PREDICTION; INCREMENTAL CONSTRUCTION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; AUTOMATED DOCKING; STRUCTURAL BASIS; PROTEIN; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION; GLIDE; ASTEX;
D O I
10.1007/s10822-015-9846-3
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Prediction of the bound configuration of small-molecule ligands that differ substantially from the cognate ligand of a protein co-crystal structure is much more challenging than re-docking the cognate ligand. Success rates for cross-docking in the range of 20-30 % are common. We present an approach that uses structural information known prior to a particular cutoff-date to make predictions on ligands whose bounds structures were determined later. The knowledge-guided docking protocol was tested on a set of ten protein targets using a total of 949 ligands. The benchmark data set, called PINC ("PINC Is Not Cognate"), is publicly available. Protein pocket similarity was used to choose representative structures for ensemble-docking. The docking protocol made use of known ligand poses prior to the cutoff-date, both to help guide the configurational search and to adjust the rank of predicted poses. Overall, the top-scoring pose family was correct over 60 % of the time, with the top-two pose families approaching a 75 % success rate. Correct poses among all those predicted were identified nearly 90 % of the time. The largest improvements came from the use of molecular similarity to improve ligand pose rankings and the strategy for identifying representative protein structures. With the exception of a single outlier target, the knowledge-guided docking protocol produced results matching the quality of cognate-ligand re-docking, but it did so on a very challenging temporally-segregated cross-docking benchmark.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 509
页数:25
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   The Protein Data Bank [J].
Berman, HM ;
Westbrook, J ;
Feng, Z ;
Gilliland, G ;
Bhat, TN ;
Weissig, H ;
Shindyalov, IN ;
Bourne, PE .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :235-242
[2]   Evaluation of DOCK 6 as a pose generation and database enrichment tool [J].
Brozell, Scott R. ;
Mukherjee, Sudipto ;
Balius, Trent E. ;
Roe, Daniel R. ;
Case, David A. ;
Rizzo, Robert C. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2012, 26 (06) :749-773
[3]   CoMFA and CoMSIA 3D QSAR and docking studies on conformationally-restrained cinnamoyl HIV-1 integrase inhibitors: Exploration of a binding mode at the active site [J].
Buolamwini, JK ;
Assefa, H .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2002, 45 (04) :841-852
[4]   Effects of inductive bias on computational evaluations of ligand-based modeling and on drug discovery [J].
Cleves, Ann E. ;
Jain, Ajay N. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2008, 22 (3-4) :147-159
[5]   Chemical and protein structural basis for biological crosstalk between PPARα and COX enzymes [J].
Cleves, Ann E. ;
Jain, Ajay N. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2015, 29 (02) :101-112
[6]   CHEMICAL-REACTIONS OF SULFONAMIDES WITH CARBONIC-ANHYDRASE [J].
COLEMAN, JE .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY, 1975, 15 :221-242
[7]   Variability in docking success rates due to dataset preparation [J].
Corbeil, Christopher R. ;
Williams, Christopher I. ;
Labute, Paul .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2012, 26 (06) :775-786
[8]   Comparison of Several Molecular Docking Programs: Pose Prediction and Virtual Screening Accuracy [J].
Cross, Jason B. ;
Thompson, David C. ;
Rai, Brajesh K. ;
Baber, J. Christian ;
Fan, Kristi Yi ;
Hu, Yongbo ;
Humblet, Christine .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2009, 49 (06) :1455-1474
[9]   CSAR Benchmark Exercise 2011-2012: Evaluation of Results from Docking and Relative Ranking of Blinded Congeneric Series [J].
Damm-Ganamet, Kelly L. ;
Smith, Richard D. ;
Dunbar, James B., Jr. ;
Stuckey, Jeanne A. ;
Carlson, Heather A. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2013, 53 (08) :1853-1870
[10]   Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy [J].
Friesner, RA ;
Banks, JL ;
Murphy, RB ;
Halgren, TA ;
Klicic, JJ ;
Mainz, DT ;
Repasky, MP ;
Knoll, EH ;
Shelley, M ;
Perry, JK ;
Shaw, DE ;
Francis, P ;
Shenkin, PS .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 47 (07) :1739-1749