Understanding Kurdish ethno-nationalism in Turkey: socio-economy, religion, and politics

被引:20
作者
Ekmekci, Faruk [1 ]
机构
[1] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Dept Int Relat, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkey
关键词
Ethno-nationalism; Kurds; Turkey; socio-economic status; religiosity; political satisfaction;
D O I
10.1080/01419870.2010.538425
中图分类号
C95 [民族学、文化人类学];
学科分类号
0304 ; 030401 ;
摘要
In his recent article in Ethnic and Racial Studies, entitled 'Curbing Kurdish ethno-nationalism in Turkey', Sarigil (2010) tests two rival hypotheses regarding Kurdish ethno-nationalism in Turkey and, using data from the World Values Survey (WVS), finds that socio-economic status (levels of income and education) better explains the individual roots of Kurdish ethno-nationalism in Turkey than does religiousness. In this paper, I offer both a methodological critique of Sarigil's research and a replication of his model with a more appropriate sample. I first argue that Sarigil's research design lacks internal validity because it studies Kurdish nationalism within a sample that predominantly consists of Turks, which invalidates his findings. I then replicate and expand Sarigil's model within a specific sample of Kurdish-speaking people in Turkey. The results show dramatic changes. Religiosity and political satisfaction seem to be better predictors of support for Kurdish ethno-nationalism in Turkey than do socio-economic factors.
引用
收藏
页码:1608 / 1617
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
AKYOL M, 2007, TURKISH DAILY N 0404
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, EUR WORLD VAL SURV 4
[3]  
CARKOGLU A, 2007, ISTANBUL TESEV PUBLI
[4]  
ENTESSAR N, 1989, THIRD WORLD Q, V11, P83
[5]   The Kurdish question in Turkey [J].
Ergil, D .
JOURNAL OF DEMOCRACY, 2000, 11 (03) :122-+
[6]  
Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies (HUIPS), 2004, TURK DEM HLTH SURV 2
[7]  
Kalaycioglu E, 2009, NEW PERSPECT TURK, P57
[9]  
Lipset SeymourMartin., 1960, POLITICAL MAN SOCIAL, V1st
[10]   The possibility principle: Choosing negative cases in comparative research [J].
Mahoney, J ;
Goertz, G .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2004, 98 (04) :653-669