Reliability of the Bishop score before labour induction at term

被引：44

作者：

Faltin-Traub, EF ^{[1
]}

Boulvain, M ^{[1
]}

Faltin, DL ^{[1
]}

Extermann, P ^{[1
]}

Irion, O ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Hosp Geneva, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland

来源：

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY | 2004年 / 112卷 / 02期

关键词：

cervical assessment; bishop score; interobserver reproducibility; agreement;

D O I：

10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00336-1

中图分类号：

R71 [妇产科学];

学科分类号：

100211 ;

摘要：

Objective: To evaluate the agreement within three pairs of observers regarding the Bishop score and an informal global evaluation of the cervix (favourable/unfavourable). Study design: We conducted a reliability study of the Bishop score. Three pairs of examiners (A-B, A-C and D-E) performed independently a cervical examination in 156 term pregnant women admitted for labour induction. We calculated the proportion of agreement and the Kappa coefficient. Results: Perfect agreement between two observers for the Bishop score was found in 44 women (28%). Accepting a difference of one point between the observers, agreement increased to 66%. Weighted Kappa coefficients for the Bishop score were 69, 54 and 35% for each pair of observers. Kappa coefficients for the informal evaluation of the cervix were 64, 45 and 46, respectively. Conclusion: Agreement between two observers evaluating the cervix is fair to substantial. An informal evaluation of the cervix is as reliable as the Bishop score. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：178 / 181

页数：4

共 16 条

[1]

Altman DG, 1990, PRACTICAL STAT MED R

[2]

[Anonymous], STAT METHODS CLIN RE

[3]

BISHOP EH, 1964, OBSTET GYNECOL, V24, P266

[4] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].

BLAND, JM ;

ALTMAN, DG .

LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310

[5]

BURNETT JE, 1966, OBSTET GYNECOL, V28, P479

[6] CERVICAL ASSESSMENT [J].

FUENTES, A ;

WILLIAMS, M .

CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 38 (02) :224-231

[7] Interobserver reliability of digital and endovaginal ultrasonographic cervical length measurements [J].

Goldberg, J ;

Newman, RB ;

Rust, PF .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (04) :853-858

[8]

Gonen R, 1998, Eur J Ultrasound, V7, P183, DOI 10.1016/S0929-8266(98)00042-1

[9] Bishop score: A poor diagnostic test to predict failed induction versus vaginal delivery [J].

Hendrix, NW ;

Chauhan, SP ;

Morrison, JC ;

Magann, EF ;

Martin, JN ;

Devoe, LD .

SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 91 (03) :248-252

[10]

HOLCOMB WL, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V78, P43

← 1 2 →