Effect of the fixator stiffness on the young regenerate bone after bone transport: Computational approach

被引:25
作者
Reina-Romo, E. [1 ]
Gomez-Benito, M. J. [2 ]
Dominguez, J. [1 ]
Niemeyer, F. [3 ]
Wehner, T. [3 ]
Simon, U. [3 ]
Claes, L. E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, Dept Mech Engn, Seville 41092, Spain
[2] Univ Zaragoza, Aragon Inst Engn Res 13A, Zaragoza 50018, Spain
[3] Univ Ulm, Inst Orthopaed Res & Biomech, D-89069 Ulm, Germany
关键词
Distraction osteogenesis; Mechanobiology; Fixator stiffness; Finite element; TISSUE DIFFERENTIATION; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; BIOPHYSICAL STIMULI; MECHANO-REGULATION; FRACTURE; SIMULATION; CALLUS; GAP; STABILITY; MOVEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.11.033
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Bone transport is a well accepted technique for the treatment of large bony defects. This process is mechanically driven, where mechanical forces play a central role in the development of tissues within the distracted gap. One of the most important mechanical factors that conditions the success of bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis is the fixator stiffness not only during the distraction phase but also during the consolidation phase. Therefore, the aim of the present work is to evaluate the effect of the stiffness of the fixator device on the interfragmentary movements and the tissue outcome during the consolidation phase. A previous differentiation model (Claes and Heigele, 1999) is extended in order to take into account the different behaviors of the tissues in tension and compression. The numerical results that were computed concur with experimental findings; a stiff fixator promotes bone formation while the excessive motion induced by extremely flexible fixators is adverse for bony bridging. Experimental interfragmentary movement is similar to that computed numerically. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:917 / 923
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] ARONSON J, 1994, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V31, P473, DOI 10.1597/1545-1569(1994)031<0473:EACEWD>2.3.CO
  • [2] 2
  • [3] ARONSON J, 1994, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P124
  • [4] ARONSON J, 1990, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P43
  • [5] ARONSON J, 1991, OPERATIVE PRINCIPLES
  • [6] Tissue differentiation and bone regeneration in an osteotomized mandible: a computational analysis of the latency period
    Boccaccio, A.
    Prendergast, P. J.
    Pappalettere, C.
    Kelly, D. J.
    [J]. MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2008, 46 (03) : 283 - 298
  • [7] The influence of expansion rates on mandibular distraction osteogenesis: A computational analysis
    Boccaccio, A.
    Pappalettere, C.
    Kelly, D. J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 35 (11) : 1940 - 1960
  • [8] Simulation of the nutrient supply in fracture healing
    Chen, G.
    Niemeyer, F.
    Wehner, T.
    Simon, U.
    Schuetz, M. A.
    Pearcy, M. J.
    Claes, L. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2009, 42 (15) : 2575 - 2583
  • [9] Influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap on the success of fracture healing
    Claes, L
    Augat, P
    Suger, G
    Wilke, HJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1997, 15 (04) : 577 - 584
  • [10] The influence of stiffness of the fixator on maturation of callus after segmental transport
    Claes, L
    Laule, J
    Wenger, K
    Suger, G
    Liener, U
    Kinzl, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2000, 82B (01): : 142 - 148