Measuring progression in frontotemporal dementia - Implications for therapeutic interventions

被引:54
作者
Kipps, C. M. [1 ]
Nestor, P. J. [1 ]
Dawson, C. E. [1 ]
Mitchell, J. [1 ]
Hodges, J. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Clin Neurosci, Cambridge, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1212/01.wnl.0000313366.76973.8a
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is a need for instruments which can measure progression of disease in frontotemporal dementia (FTD), particularly with respect to the assessment of potential therapeutic agents. Methods: The Cambridge Early Onset Dementia Clinic database was reviewed for all prospectively enrolled cases of FTD with documented scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination ( ACE) on at least two occasions. We identified 50 cases fulfilling these criteria: pathologic confirmation was present in 11 of 16 patients who had died, 12 of the remainder had imaging abnormalities on their initial scans, and 22 had structural scans no different from controls. We compared these groups to a cohort with early AD ( n = 25) and healthy controls ( n = 10). Results: There was clear cognitive decline ( measured by the MMSE and ACE) in patients who had died, and those with documented atrophy on initial MRI scan. In contrast, patients with FTD with normal scans showed no change in cognitive scores over a much longer interval, and serial ACE measurements paralleled those of controls. Power calculations showed that the inclusion of these patients with FTD would significantly increase the number of cases needed in any therapeutic trial. Conclusion: Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination is a simple monitoring tool which can detect progression of disease in frontotemporal dementia over a 1- to 2-year interval without the need for serial imaging. We estimated that a clinical trial that enrolled subjects with abnormal MR scans would require 135 subjects per group to detect a small effect, and 35 for a medium effect.
引用
收藏
页码:2046 / 2052
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]   Frontotemporal lobar degeneration - Demographic characteristics of 353 patients [J].
Johnson, JK ;
Diehl, J ;
Mendez, MF ;
Neuhaus, J ;
Shapira, JS ;
Forman, M ;
Chute, DJ ;
Roberson, ED ;
Pace-Savitsky, C ;
Neumann, M ;
Chow, TW ;
Rosen, HJ ;
Forstl, H ;
Kurz, A ;
Miller, BL .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2005, 62 (06) :925-930
[12]   Frontotemporal lobar degeneration without lobar atrophy [J].
Josephs, Keith A. ;
Whitwell, Jennifer L. ;
Jack, Clifford R. ;
Parisi, Joseph E. ;
Dickson, Dennis W. .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2006, 63 (11) :1632-1638
[13]   Clinical significance of lobar atrophy in frontotemporal dementia: Application of an MRI visual rating scale [J].
Kipps, Christopher M. ;
Davies, R. Rhys ;
Mitchell, Joanna ;
Kril, Jillian J. ;
Halliday, Glenda M. ;
Hodges, John R. .
DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2007, 23 (05) :334-342
[14]  
KIPPS CM, 2007, 59 ANN M AM ASS NEUR
[15]   Distribution of brain atrophy in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia [J].
Kril, JJ ;
Macdonald, V ;
Patel, S ;
Png, F ;
Halliday, GM .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 232 (1-2) :83-90
[16]   Clinicopathological staging of frontotemporal dementia severity: Correlation with regional atrophy [J].
Kril, JJ ;
Halliday, GM .
DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2004, 17 (04) :311-315
[17]   Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE) for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of dementia [J].
Larner, A. J. .
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2007, 109 (06) :491-494
[18]  
Lenth R. V., JAVA APPLETS POWER S
[19]   A brief cognitive test battery to differentiate Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia [J].
Mathuranath, PS ;
Nestor, PJ ;
Berrios, GE ;
Rakowicz, W ;
Hodges, JR .
NEUROLOGY, 2000, 55 (11) :1613-1620
[20]   Clinical and pathological diagnosis of Frontotemporal Dementia - Report of the work group on Frontotemporal Dementia and Pick's disease [J].
McKhann, GM ;
Albert, MS ;
Grossman, M ;
Miller, B ;
Dickson, D ;
Trojanowski, JQ .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2001, 58 (11) :1803-1809