Evaluating continuous training programmes by using the generalized propensity score

被引:90
作者
Kluve, Jochen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schneider, Hilmar [3 ]
Uhlendorff, Arne [3 ,4 ]
Zhao, Zhong [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Sch Business & Econ, D-10178 Berlin, Germany
[2] Rheinisch Westfal Inst Wirtschaftsforsch, Essen, Germany
[3] Univ Mannheim, Inst Study Labor, Bonn, Germany
[4] Deutsch Inst Wirtschaftsforsch, Berlin, Germany
[5] Renmin Univ China, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Continuous treatment; Generalized propensity score; Programme evaluation; Training; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-985X.2011.01000.x
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
. The paper assesses the heterogeneity of treatment effects arising from variation in the duration of training. We use German administrative data that have the extraordinary feature that the amount of treatment varies continuously from 10 days to 395 days (i.e. 13 months). This feature allows us to estimate a continuous doseresponse function that relates each value of the dose, i.e. days of training, to the individual post-treatment probability of employment (the response). The doseresponse function is estimated after adjusting for covariate imbalance by using the generalized propensity score, which is a recently developed method for covariate adjustment under continuous treatment regimes. Our data have the advantage that we can consider both the actual and the planned durations of training as treatment variables: if only actual durations are observed, treatment effect estimates may be biased because of endogenous exits. Our results indicate an increasing doseresponse function for treatments of up to 120 days, which then flattens out, i.e. longer training programmes do not seem to add an additional treatment effect.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 617
页数:31
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Econometric Evaluation of Labour Market Policies
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, APPL BAYESIAN MODELI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, KEEL MAN DEC CURR
[4]  
[Anonymous], APPL EC Q
[5]  
[Anonymous], 200506 U ST GALL DEP
[6]   Assessing the performance of matching algorithms when selection into treatment is strong [J].
Augurzky, Boris ;
Kluve, Jochen .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2007, 22 (03) :533-557
[7]  
BLIEN U, 2004, Z ARBEITSMARKTFORSCH, V37, P146
[8]   An assessment of propensity score matching as a nonexperimental impact estimator - Evidence from Mexico's PROGRESA program [J].
Diaz, JJ ;
Handa, S .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2006, 41 (02) :319-345
[9]  
Flores C. A., 2011, REV EC STAT IN PRESS
[10]   Characterizing selection bias using experimental data [J].
Heckman, J ;
Ichimura, H ;
Smith, J ;
Todd, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 1998, 66 (05) :1017-1098