Haemodynamic effects of induction of general anaesthesia with propofol during epidural anaesthesia

被引:12
作者
Kasaba, T [1 ]
Kondou, O [1 ]
Yoshimura, Y [1 ]
Watanabe, Y [1 ]
Takasaki, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Miyazaki Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, Miyazaki 88916, Japan
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE | 1998年 / 45卷 / 11期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF03012392
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Purpose: To clarify whether propofol administration during thoracic or lumbar epidural anaesthesia intensities the haemodynamic depression associated with epidural anaesthesia. Methods: Patients (n = 45) undergoing procedures of similar magnitude were randomly divided into three study groups: a control group (n = 15) receiving general anaesthesia alone and two study groups undergoing thoracic (n = 15) and lumbar epidural anaesthesia (n = 15) before induction of general anaesthesia. All patients received 2 mg.kg(-1) propofol at a rate of 200 mg.min(-1), followed by a continuous infusion of 4 mg.kg(-1).hr(-1). Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were measured at baseline. three minutes after induction, and one minute after tracheal intubation in all three groups and at 20 min after epidural anaesthesia was established in the thoracic and lumbar groups. Results: Following epidural anaesthesia, MAP decreased from 94 +/- 14 (SD) at baseline to 75 +/- 11 mmHg (P < 0.0001) in the thoracic group and from 92 +/- 12 to 83 +/- 15 mmHg in the lumbar group. After propofol administration, MAP decreased further in the thoracic group to 63 +/- 9 mmHg (P = 0.0077) and to 67 +/- 10 mmHg (P = 0.0076) in the lumbar group. The MAP following propofol induction in the thoracic group (P < 0.0001) and in the lumbar group (P = 0.0001) was lower than MAP in the control group (81 +/- 9 mmHg), HR decreased only in response to thbracic epidural anaesthesia (P = 0.0066). Conclusion: The hypotensive effects of propofol are additive to those of epidural anaesthesia, resulting in a profound decrease in mean arterial pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:1061 / 1065
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
COATES DP, 1987, ANESTH ANALG, V66, P64
[2]  
CULLEN PM, 1987, ANESTH ANALG, V66, P1115
[3]   SYMPATHETIC RESPONSES TO INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA IN HUMANS WITH PROPOFOL OR ETOMIDATE [J].
EBERT, TJ ;
MUZI, M ;
BERENS, R ;
GOFF, D ;
KAMPINE, JP .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (05) :725-733
[4]  
Fanard L, 1988, Anaesthesia, V43 Suppl, P87, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09082.x
[5]  
GEPTS E, 1987, ANESTH ANALG, V66, P1256
[6]   CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECTS OF PROPOFOL IN THE ANESTHETIZED DOG [J].
GOODCHILD, CS ;
SERRAO, JM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1989, 63 (01) :87-92
[7]   COMPARISON OF INFUSIONS OF PROPOFOL AND METHOHEXITONE TO PROVIDE LIGHT GENERAL-ANESTHESIA DURING SURGERY WITH REGIONAL BLOCKADE [J].
JESSOP, E ;
GROUNDS, RM ;
MORGAN, M ;
LUMLEY, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1985, 57 (12) :1173-1177
[8]   PHARMACOKINETICS OF PROPOFOL (DIPRIVAN) IN ELDERLY PATIENTS [J].
KIRKPATRICK, T ;
COCKSHOTT, ID ;
DOUGLAS, EJ ;
NIMMO, WS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1988, 60 (02) :146-150
[9]   HYPOTENSION DURING EPIDURAL ANALGESIA FOR CESAREAN-SECTION - ARTERIAL AND CENTRAL VENOUS-PRESSURE CHANGES AFTER ACUTE INTRAVENOUS LOADING WITH 2 LITERS OF HARTMANN SOLUTION [J].
LEWIS, M ;
THOMAS, P ;
WILKES, RG .
ANAESTHESIA, 1983, 38 (03) :250-253
[10]  
Luchetti M, 1996, REGION ANESTH, V21, P465