The survival of support rings in complex acetabular revision surgery

被引:21
作者
Carroll, F. A. [1 ]
Hoad-Reddick, D. A. [1 ]
Kerry, R. M. [1 ]
Stockley, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] No Gen Hosp, Lower Limb Arthroplasty Unit, Sheffield S5 7AU, S Yorkshire, England
来源
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME | 2008年 / 90B卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.19789
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Between 1980 and 2000, 63 support rings were used in the management of acetabular deficiency in a series of 60 patients, with a mean follow-up of 8.75 years (2 months to 23.8 years). There was a minimum five-year follow-up for successful reconstructions. The indication for revision surgery was aseptic loosening in 30 cases and infection in 33. All cases were Paprosky III defects; IIIA in 33 patients (52.4%) and IIIB in 30 (47.6%), including four with pelvic dissociation. A total of 26 patients (43.3%) have died since surgery, and 34 (56.7%) remain under clinical review. With acetabular revision for infection or aseptic loosening as the definition of failure, we report success in 53 (84%) of the reconstructions. A total of 12 failures (19%) required further surgery, four (6.3%) for aseptic loosening of the acetabular construct, six (9.5%) for recurrent infection and two (3.2%) for recurrent dislocation requiring captive components. Complications, seen in 11 patients (18.3%), included six femoral or sciatic neuropraxias which all resolved, one grade III heterotopic ossification, one on-table acetabular revision for instability, and three early post-operative dislocations managed by manipulation under anaesthesia, with no further instability. We recommend support rings and morcellised bone graft for significant acetabular bone deficiency that cannot be reconstructed using mesh.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 578
页数:5
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
AMSTUTZ HC, 1982, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V170, P21
[2]   REVISION ARTHROPLASTY USING AN ANTI-PROTRUSIO CAGE FOR MASSIVE ACETABULAR BONE DEFICIENCY [J].
BERRY, DJ ;
MULLER, ME .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1992, 74 (05) :711-715
[3]   Acetabular revision with allograft bone -: 103 revisions with 3 reconstruction alternatives, followed for 0.3-13 years [J].
Böhm, P ;
Banzhaf, S .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 70 (03) :240-249
[4]   ECTOPIC OSSIFICATION FOLLOWING TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT - INCIDENCE AND A METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION [J].
BROOKER, AF ;
BOWERMAN, JW ;
ROBINSON, RA ;
RILEY, LH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1973, A 55 (08) :1629-1632
[5]   Reliability of acetabular bone defect classification systems in revision total hip arthroplasty [J].
Campbell, DG ;
Garbuz, DS ;
Masri, BA ;
Duncan, CP .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2001, 16 (01) :83-86
[6]  
GROSS AE, 2004, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V429, P193
[7]   Acetabular reconstruction with morcellized allograft and ring support - A medium-term review [J].
Haddad, FS ;
Shergill, N ;
Muirhead-Allwood, SK .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1999, 14 (07) :788-795
[8]  
HEDLEY AK, 1988, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P75
[9]  
HUNGERFORD DS, 1988, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P12
[10]   RESULTS OF REVISION OF TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY [J].
HUNTER, GA ;
WELSH, RP ;
CAMERON, HU ;
BAILEY, WH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1979, 61 (04) :419-421