Continence alterations after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis do not diminish quality of life

被引:26
作者
Holubar, S [1 ]
Hyman, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
关键词
continence; ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; quality of life;
D O I
10.1007/s10350-004-6799-3
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare continence after double-stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index and to assess the impact on quality of life using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. METHODS: Fifty-five patients randomly selected from a prospective pelvic pouch database were matched with regard to age and gender with patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the same time interval by the same surgeon. Patients were mailed the two questionnaires, which were reviewed by an independent observer. Demographics, duration since surgery, and functional results were recorded. The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scores were compared by the analysis of variance method. RESULTS: Fifty-one pelvic pouch and 50 laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients were able to be contacted and completed both of the measuring tools. For the pouch patients, the median number of bowel movements per day was six (range, 2-15), with two patients reporting more than occasional nighttime incontinence. Mean incontinence scores were higher for the pelvic pouch patients than for the laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients (17.8 vs. 10.7; P = 0.03). However, the quality-of life scores were very similar: lifestyle (3.8 vs. 3.83; P 0.88), depression/self-perception (3-81 vs. 3.83; P = 0.94), embarrassment (3.76 vs. 3.8; P = 0.84), and behavior/ coping (3.57 vs. 3.71; P = 0.5). CONCLUSION: Although continence is clearly altered after pelvic pouch surgery, quality of life is extremely well preserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1489 / 1491
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Functional Outcome and Quality of Life after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis within a Defined Population in Sweden
    Dafnis, George
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2019, 37 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [32] Hospital Readmission Rates after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis
    Datta, Indraneel
    Buie, W. Donald
    MacLean, Anthony R.
    Heine, John A.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (01) : 55 - 58
  • [33] Sexual function after failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
    Bengtsson, Jonas
    Lindholm, Elisabet
    Nordgren, Svante
    Berndtsson, Ina
    Oresland, Tom
    Borjesson, Lars
    JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2011, 5 (05) : 407 - 414
  • [34] Predictors of Pouchitis After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Children
    Dharmaraj, Rajmohan
    Dasgupta, Mahua
    Simpson, Pippa
    Noe, Joshua
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2016, 63 (04) : E58 - E62
  • [35] Ileal pouch salvage following failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
    Stephanie S. Saltzberg
    Christine DiEdwardo
    Thayer E. Scott
    Wayne W. LaMorte
    Arthur F. Stucchi
    James M. Becker
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 1999, 3 : 633 - 641
  • [36] Ileal pouch salvage following failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
    Saltzberg, SS
    DiEdwardo, C
    Scott, TE
    LaMorte, WW
    Stucchi, AF
    Becker, JM
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 1999, 3 (06) : 633 - 640
  • [37] ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS WITHOUT ILEOSTOMY
    GALANDIUK, S
    WOLFF, BG
    DOZOIS, RR
    BEART, RW
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1991, 34 (10) : 870 - 873
  • [38] A Longitudinal Study of Quality of Life and Functional Outcome of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis After Proctocolectomy With Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis
    Tulchinsky, Hagit
    Dotan, Iris
    Halpern, Zamir
    Klausner, Joseph M.
    Rabau, Micha
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2010, 53 (06) : 866 - 873
  • [39] Functional outcome of stapled ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis versus handsewn pouch-anal anastomosis
    Naoto Saigusa
    Takayuki Kurahashi
    Toshio Nakamura
    Haruhiko Sugimura
    Shozo Baba
    Hiroyuki Konno
    Satoshi Nakamura
    Surgery Today, 2000, 30 : 575 - 581
  • [40] Influence of ileal pouch capacity and anal sphincteric function on the clinical outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
    Yoshio Takesue
    Takashi Yokoyama
    Takashi Kodama
    Yoshiaki Murakami
    Yuji Imamura
    Yuichiro Matsuura
    Surgery Today, 1997, 27 : 392 - 397