Five lessons to guide more effective biodiversity conservation message framing

被引:107
作者
Kusmanoff, Alexander M. [1 ,3 ]
Fidler, Fiona [2 ]
Gordon, Ascelin [1 ]
Garrard, Georgia E. [1 ,3 ]
Bekessy, Sarah A. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Global Urban & Social Studies, ICON Sci, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch BioSci, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Natl Environm Sci Programme, Room 532,Goddard Bldg, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, ARC Ctr Excellence Environm Decis, Room 525,Goddard Bldg, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
advocacy; biodiversity conservation; conservation psychology; cognitive bias; communication; framing; messaging; social norm; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTANCE; SYSTEMATIC-APPROACH; VALUE ORIENTATIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BEHAVIOR; ENGAGEMENT; INTERPLAY; DECISION; MATTERS; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.13482
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Communication and advocacy approaches that influence attitudes and behaviors are key to addressing conservation problems, and the way an issue is framed can affect how people view, judge, and respond to an issue. Responses to conservation interventions can also be influenced by subtle wording changes in statements that may appeal to different values, activate social norms, influence a person's affect or mood, or trigger certain biases, each of which can differently influence the resulting engagement, attitudes, and behavior. We contend that by strategically considering how conservation communications are framed, they can be made more effective with little or no additional cost. Key framing considerations include, emphasizing things that matter to the audience, evoking helpful social norms, reducing psychological distance, leveraging useful biases, and, where practicable, testing messages. These lessons will help communicators think strategically about how to frame messages for greater effect.
引用
收藏
页码:1131 / 1141
页数:11
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [11] Capella J. N., 1997, SPIRAL CYNICISM PRES
  • [12] Christmas S., 2013, Engaging people in biodiversity issues. Final report of the Biodiversity Segmentation Scoping Study
  • [13] Cialdini R.B., 2006, Social Influence, V1, P3, DOI DOI 10.1080/15534510500181459
  • [14] Cialdini R.B., 2008, INFLUENCE SCI PRACTI, V5th
  • [15] Crafting normative messages to protect the environment
    Cialdini, RB
    [J]. CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 12 (04) : 105 - 109
  • [16] A FOCUS THEORY OF NORMATIVE CONDUCT - RECYCLING THE CONCEPT OF NORMS TO REDUCE LITTERING IN PUBLIC PLACES
    CIALDINI, RB
    RENO, RR
    KALLGREN, CA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 58 (06) : 1015 - 1026
  • [17] Value orientations and environmental beliefs in five countries - Validity of an instrument to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value orientations
    de Groot, Judith I. M.
    Steg, Linda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 38 (03) : 318 - 332
  • [18] Influencing behaviour: The mindspace way
    Dolan, P.
    Hallsworth, M.
    Halpern, D.
    King, D.
    Metcalfe, R.
    Vlaev, I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 33 (01) : 264 - 277
  • [19] The implications of framing effects for citizen competence
    Druckman, JN
    [J]. POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2001, 23 (03) : 225 - 256
  • [20] FRAMING - TOWARD CLARIFICATION OF A FRACTURED PARADIGM
    ENTMAN, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 1993, 43 (04) : 51 - 58