Five lessons to guide more effective biodiversity conservation message framing

被引:107
作者
Kusmanoff, Alexander M. [1 ,3 ]
Fidler, Fiona [2 ]
Gordon, Ascelin [1 ]
Garrard, Georgia E. [1 ,3 ]
Bekessy, Sarah A. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Global Urban & Social Studies, ICON Sci, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch BioSci, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Natl Environm Sci Programme, Room 532,Goddard Bldg, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, ARC Ctr Excellence Environm Decis, Room 525,Goddard Bldg, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
advocacy; biodiversity conservation; conservation psychology; cognitive bias; communication; framing; messaging; social norm; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTANCE; SYSTEMATIC-APPROACH; VALUE ORIENTATIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BEHAVIOR; ENGAGEMENT; INTERPLAY; DECISION; MATTERS; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.13482
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Communication and advocacy approaches that influence attitudes and behaviors are key to addressing conservation problems, and the way an issue is framed can affect how people view, judge, and respond to an issue. Responses to conservation interventions can also be influenced by subtle wording changes in statements that may appeal to different values, activate social norms, influence a person's affect or mood, or trigger certain biases, each of which can differently influence the resulting engagement, attitudes, and behavior. We contend that by strategically considering how conservation communications are framed, they can be made more effective with little or no additional cost. Key framing considerations include, emphasizing things that matter to the audience, evoking helpful social norms, reducing psychological distance, leveraging useful biases, and, where practicable, testing messages. These lessons will help communicators think strategically about how to frame messages for greater effect.
引用
收藏
页码:1131 / 1141
页数:11
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR
    AJZEN, I
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) : 179 - 211
  • [2] Akerlof K., 2013, Nudging toward a healthy natural environment: how behavior change research can inform conservation
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1941, PUBLIC OPIN QUART, V5, P91
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, GLOBAL WARMINGS 6 AM
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, New York Times.
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2004, Don't Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate
  • [7] The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test
    Bar-Anan, Yoav
    Liberman, Nira
    Trope, Yaacov
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2006, 135 (04) : 609 - 622
  • [8] Baumeister R. F., 2001, Review of General Psychology, V5, P323, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323, DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323, 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323]
  • [9] Ask not what nature can do for you: A critique of ecosystem services as a communication strategy
    Bekessy, S. A.
    Runge, M. C.
    Kusmanoff, A. M.
    Keith, D. A.
    Wintle, B. A.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2018, 224 : 71 - 74
  • [10] Blackmore E., 2013, COMMON CAUSE NATURE