Effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for treating dementia: Evidence review for a clinical practice guideline

被引:553
作者
Raina, Parminder [1 ]
Santaguida, Pasqualina [1 ]
Ismaila, Afisi [1 ]
Patterson, Christopher [1 ]
Cowan, David [1 ]
Levine, Mitchell [1 ]
Booker, Lynda [1 ]
Oremus, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, McMaster Univ Evidence Based Pract Ctr, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-148-5-200803040-00009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The effectiveness of the 5 U. S. Food and Drug Administration-approved pharmacologic therapies for dementias in achieving clinically relevant improvements is unclear. Purpose: To review the evidence for the effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors ( donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and tacrine) and the neuropeptide-modifying agent memantine in achieving clinically relevant improvements, primarily in cognition, global function, behavior, and quality of life, for patients with dementia. Data Sources: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, PREMEDLINE, EMBASE, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, CINAHL, AgeLine, and PsycINFO from January 1986 through November 2006. Study Selection: English-language randomized, controlled trials were included in the review if they evaluated pharmacologic agents for adults with a diagnosis of dementia, did not use a crossover design, and had a quality score of at least 3 on the Jadad scale. Data Extraction: Data were extracted on study characteristics and outcomes, including adverse events. Effect sizes were calculated and data were combined when appropriate. Data Synthesis: 96 publications representing 59 unique studies were eligible for this review. Both cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine had consistent effects in the domains of cognition and global assessment, but summary estimates showed small effect sizes. Outcomes in the domains of behavior and quality of life were evaluated less frequently and showed less consistent effects. Most studies were of short duration ( 6 months), which limited their ability to detect delay in onset or progression of dementia. Three studies directly compared different cholinesterase inhibitors and found no differences in cognition and behavior. Limitations: Limitations of available studies included short duration, inclusion of only patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease, poor reporting of adverse events, lack of clear definitions for statistical significance, limited evaluation of behavior and quality-of-life outcomes, and limited direct comparison of different treatments. Conclusions: Treatment of dementia with cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine can result in statistically significant but clinically marginal improvement in measures of cognition and global assessment of dementia.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / W85
页数:22
相关论文
共 154 条
  • [1] Efficacy and tolerability of rivastigmine in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type
    Agid, Y
    Dubois, B
    Anand, R
    Gharabawi, G
    [J]. CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1998, 59 (12): : 837 - 845
  • [2] Effects of galantamine versus donepezil on sleep in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease and their caregivers - A double-blind, head-to-head, randomized pilot study
    Ancoli-Israel, S
    Amatniek, J
    Ascher, S
    Sadik, K
    Ramaswamy, K
    [J]. ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS, 2005, 19 (04) : 240 - 245
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1992, ICD10 WHO
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1998, Int J Geriatr Psychopharmacol
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2004, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1994, Diagnostic criteria from DSM-IV
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1987, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, V4th
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1980, DSM 3
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2005, COCHRANE DATABASE SY
  • [10] Quetiapine and rivastigmine and cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial
    Ballard, C
    Margallo-Lana, M
    Juszczak, E
    Douglas, S
    Swann, A
    Thomas, A
    O'Brien, J
    Everratt, A
    Sadler, S
    Maddison, C
    Lee, L
    Bannister, C
    Elvish, R
    Jacoby, R
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 330 (7496): : 874 - 877