Testing the Foundations of Signal Detection Theory in Recognition Memory

被引:35
作者
Kellen, David [1 ]
Winiger, Samuel [2 ]
Dunn, John C. [3 ,4 ]
Singmann, Henrik [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Dept Psychol, 430 Huntington Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[2] Univ Zurich, Sch Psychol Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Western Australia, Dept Expt Psychol, Nedlands, WA, Australia
[4] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Arts & Humanities, Churchlands, WA, Australia
[5] Univ Coll London UCL, Dept Expt Psychol, London, England
[6] Univ Warwick, Dept Psychol, Coventry, W Midlands, England
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
signal detection theory; ROCs; recognition memory; area theorem; axiom testing; STATE-TRACE ANALYSIS; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; DISCRETE-STATE; 2-HIGH-THRESHOLD MODEL; MULTINOMIAL MODELS; THRESHOLD MODELS; CHOICE AXIOM; GOOD FIT; ROCS; ITEM;
D O I
10.1037/rev0000288
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Signal detection theory (SDT) plays a central role in the characterization of human judgments in a wide range of domains, most prominently in recognition memory. But despite its success, many of its fundamental properties are often misunderstood, especially when it comes to its testability. The present work examines five main properties that are characteristic of existing SDT models of recognition memory: (a) random-scale representation, (b) latent-variable independence, (c) likelihood-ratio monotonicity, (d) ROC function asymmetry, and (e) nonthreshold representation. In each case, we establish testable consequences and test them against data collected in the appropriately designed recognition-memory experiment. We also discuss the connection between yes-no, forced-choice, and ranking judgments. This connection introduces additional behavioral constraints and yields an alternative method of reconstructing yes-no ROC functions. Overall, the reported results provide a strong empirical foundation for SDT modeling in recognition memory.
引用
收藏
页码:1022 / 1050
页数:29
相关论文
共 166 条
[11]   New paradoxes of risky decision making [J].
Birnbaum, Michael H. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2008, 115 (02) :463-501
[12]   Testing theories of risky decision making via critical tests [J].
Birnbaum, Michael H. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 2
[13]   Testing Mixture Models of Transitive Preference: Comment on Regenwetter, Dana, and Davis-Stober (2011) [J].
Birnbaum, Michael H. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2011, 118 (04) :675-683
[14]  
Block H. D., 1960, CONTRIBUTIONS PROBAB, P97
[15]   Overdistribution Illusions: Categorical Judgments Produce Them, Confidence Ratings Reduce Them [J].
Brainerd, C. J. ;
Nakamura, K. ;
Reyna, V. F. ;
Holliday, R. E. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2017, 146 (01) :20-40
[16]   Police Lineups of the Future? [J].
Brewer, Neil ;
Weber, Nathan ;
Guerin, Nicola .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2020, 75 (01) :76-91
[17]   Recognition ROCs Are Curvilinear-or Are They? On Premature Arguments Against the Two-High-Threshold Model of Recognition [J].
Broeder, Arndt ;
Schuetz, Julia .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2009, 35 (03) :587-606
[18]   Lineup fairness: propitious heterogeneity and the diagnostic feature-detection hypothesis [J].
Carlson, Curt A. ;
Jones, Alyssa R. ;
Whittington, Jane E. ;
Lockamyeir, Robert F. ;
Carlson, Maria A. ;
Wooten, Alex R. .
COGNITIVE RESEARCH-PRINCIPLES AND IMPLICATIONS, 2019, 4 (1)
[19]   Obtaining separate measures for implicit and explicit memory [J].
Chechile, Richard A. ;
Sloboda, Lara N. ;
Chamberland, Jessica R. .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 56 (01) :35-53
[20]   Properties of reverse hazard functions [J].
Chechile, Richard A. .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 55 (03) :203-222