Is Political Skill Always Beneficial? Why and When Politically Skilled Employees Become Targets of Coworker Social Undermining

被引:19
作者
Sun, Shuhua [1 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, AB Freeman Sch Business, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
关键词
political skill; social undermining; rivalry; social rank theory; rivalry theory; METHOD BIAS; RANK; MEDIATION; MODEL; POWER; INGRATIATION; COMPETITION; EVOLUTION; CONFLICT; RIVALRY;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.2021.1476
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The benefits of political skill at work have been extensively documented and highlighted. Existing research also reports unexpectedly equivocal and even positive relationships between employee political skill and coworker social undermining, suggesting that politically skilled employees can become targets of coworker social undermining. However, there is a lack of research explaining why and when employee political skill can lead to coworker social undermining. This research, drawing from social rank theory and the theory of rivalry, offers a novel lens to answer these questions. Specifically, I theorize that employee political skill evokes coworker social undermining by affecting coworker perception of status threat, particularly when the coworker views the focal politically skilled employee as a personal rival. Findings from four studies-one correlational two-wave study and three experiments-provide support for these predictions. Further, nonrival competition and interpersonal disliking as alternative potential explanations to the hypothesized moderating effects of rivalry were ruled out. This study provides a theory-driven explanation of an unintended consequence of employee political skill and offers a more balanced understanding of the effects of political skill at work. Theoretical and future research implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1142 / 1162
页数:22
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
Anderson C., 2014, PSYCHOL SOCIAL STATU, P47, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0867-73
[2]   Punishing hubris: The perils of overestimating one's status in a group [J].
Anderson, Cameron ;
Ames, Daniel R. ;
Gosling, Samuel D. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2008, 34 (01) :90-101
[3]   The Pursuit of Status in Social Groups [J].
Anderson, Cameron ;
Kilduff, Gavin J. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 18 (05) :295-298
[4]   UNDERTRUSTED, OVERTRUSTED, OR JUST RIGHT? THE FAIRNESS OF (IN)CONGRUENCE BETWEEN TRUST WANTED AND TRUST RECEIVED [J].
Baer, Michael D. ;
Frank, Emma L. ;
Matta, Fadel K. ;
Luciano, Margaret M. ;
Wellman, Ned .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2021, 64 (01) :180-206
[5]   RELATIONAL SCHEMAS AND THE PROCESSING OF SOCIAL INFORMATION [J].
BALDWIN, MW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (03) :461-484
[6]   Status Dynamics [J].
Bendersky, Corinne ;
Pai, Jieun .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 5, 2018, 5 :183-199
[7]   Status Conflict in Groups [J].
Bendersky, Corinne ;
Hays, Nicholas A. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (02) :323-340
[8]   The prediction of task and contextual performance by political skill: A meta-analysis and moderator test [J].
Bing, Mark N. ;
Davison, H. Kristl ;
Minor, Inneka ;
Novicevic, Milorad M. ;
Frink, Dwight D. .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2011, 79 (02) :563-577
[9]   What Influences How Higher-Status People Respond to Lower-Status Others? Effects of Procedural Fairness, Outcome Favorability, and Concerns About Status [J].
Blader, Steven L. ;
Chen, Ya-Ru .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (04) :1040-1060
[10]   Leader reputation: The role of mentoring, political skill, contextual learning, and adaptation [J].
Blass, Fred R. ;
Ferris, Gerald R. .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 46 (01) :5-19