The Benefits of an Employee-Friendly Company on Job Attitudes and Health of Employees: Findings from Matched Employer-Employee Data

被引:2
作者
Herr, Raphael M. [1 ,2 ]
Brokmeier, Luisa Leonie [1 ,2 ]
Fischer, Joachim E. [1 ]
Mauss, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Mannheim, Ctr Prevent Med & Digital Hlth CPD, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany
[2] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Dept Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
employee-friendly company; job attitudes; health; matched employer-employee data; human resources (HR) management; company level; HEART-DISEASE; PERFORMANCE; PRODUCTIVITY; METAANALYSIS; WORKPLACE; RESOURCES; TURNOVER; IMPACT; MODEL; RISK;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph19159046
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: This study explored the association of an employee-friendly work environment with employees' job attitudes (engagement, commitment, turnover intentions, and job satisfaction), and health (mental and general health), applying matched employer-employee data. Methods: The German Linked Personnel Panel (LPP; n = 14,182) survey simultaneously captures the data of employees and the human resources (HR) management of companies. A two-step cluster analysis of 16 items of the HR valuation identified relatively more- and less-employee-friendly companies (EFCs). Logistic regressions tested differences between these companies in the assessment of job attitudes and health of their employees. Results: Compared to less-EFCS, more-EFCS had a reduced risk of poorer job attitudes and substandard health of their employees. For example, the risk for higher turnover intentions was reduced by 33% in more-EFCS (OR = 0.683, 95% C.I. = 0.626-0.723), and more-EFCS had an 18% reduced chance of poor mental health reporting of their employees (OR = 0.822, 95% C.I. = 0.758-0.892). Conclusions: More-EFCS have more motivated and healthier employees. The most distinct factors for more-EFCS were: the existence of development plans for employees, opportunities for advancement and development, and personnel development measures.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[21]   Psychosocial work stressors as antecedents of musculoskeletal problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis of stability-adjusted longitudinal studies [J].
Lang, Jessica ;
Ochsmann, Elke ;
Kraus, Thomas ;
Lang, Jonas W. B. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2012, 75 (07) :1163-1174
[22]   COMMITMENT TO ORGANIZATIONS AND OCCUPATIONS - EXTENSION AND TEST OF A 3-COMPONENT CONCEPTUALIZATION [J].
MEYER, JP ;
ALLEN, NJ ;
SMITH, CA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (04) :538-551
[23]   Workplace resources to improve both employee well-being and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Nielsen, Karina ;
Nielsen, Morten B. ;
Ogbonnaya, Chidiebere ;
Kansala, Marja ;
Saari, Eveliina ;
Isaksson, Kerstin .
WORK AND STRESS, 2017, 31 (02) :101-120
[24]   Integrated and Isolated Impact of High-Performance Work Practices on Employee Health and Well-Being: A Comparative Study [J].
Ogbonnaya, Chidiebere ;
Daniels, Kevin ;
Connolly, Sara ;
van Veldhoven, Marc .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 22 (01) :98-114
[25]  
Patro C.S, 2013, P 2 INT C MANAGING H, P13
[26]   Human resource management-well-being-performance research revisited: Past, present, and future [J].
Peccei, Riccardo ;
van de Voorde, Karina .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 29 (04) :539-563
[27]  
Phipps S., 2013, Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications Conflict, V17, P107
[28]   Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies [J].
Podsakoff, PM ;
MacKenzie, SB ;
Lee, JY ;
Podsakoff, NP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (05) :879-903
[29]  
Schaufeli W.B., 2004, Preliminary manual, DOI DOI 10.1037/T01350-000
[30]   A Comparison of Job Stress Models Associations With Employee Well-Being, Absenteeism, Presenteeism, and Resulting Costs [J].
Schmidt, Burkhard ;
Schneider, Michael ;
Seeger, Philipp ;
van Vianen, Annelies ;
Loerbroks, Adrian ;
Herr, Raphael M. .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 61 (07) :535-544