Subacute and chronic low back pain. Reliability and validity of a Swedish version of the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire

被引:0
|
作者
Johansson, E [1 ]
Lindberg, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Caring Sci, SE-75183 Uppsala, Sweden
来源
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE | 1998年 / 30卷 / 03期
关键词
back pain; disability; functional measure; measurement; physiotherapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of a Swedish version of the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire (RM-Sw), and to describe demographic factors in patients with low back pain of at least 4 weeks' duration seeking outpatient physical therapy treatment in primary care settings. Seventy-two patients participated in the study, The intraclass correlation coefficient for a one-week test-retest interval was 0.88. There was moderate positive correlation with measures of perceived disability (r = 0.64, p < 0.001; r = 0.69, p < 0.001) and pain severity (r = 0.54, p < 0.001), and low negative correlation with measures of perceived life control (r = -0.32, p < 0.01) and general activity (r = -0.27, p < 0.05). Gender, education and occupation were only moderately related to RM-Sw scores, explaining 14% of the variance in the scores. It is concluded that RM-Sw is a reliable and valid measure of functional ability in low back pain.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 143
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bournemouth questionnaire Arabic version: Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability for patients with low back pain
    Elerian, Ahmed Ebrahim
    Abdel-Aal, Nabil Mahmoud
    Abdelhay, Mohamed Ibrahim
    PHYSIOTHERAPY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 25 (03)
  • [22] Danish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Part 1: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity in two different populations
    Henrik Hein Lauridsen
    Jan Hartvigsen
    Claus Manniche
    Lars Korsholm
    Niels Grunnet-Nilsson
    European Spine Journal, 2006, 15 : 1705 - 1716
  • [23] Danish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Part 1: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity in two different populations
    Lauridsen, Henrik Hein
    Hartvigsen, Jan
    Manniche, Claus
    Korsholm, Lars
    Grunnet-Nilsson, Niels
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (11) : 1705 - 1716
  • [24] Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris back pain questionnaire: Part 2
    Riddle, DL
    Stratford, PW
    Binkley, JM
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1998, 78 (11): : 1197 - 1207
  • [25] Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain.
    Berman, Brian M.
    Langevin, Helene H.
    Witt, Claudia M.
    Dubner, Ronald
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 363 (05) : 454 - 461
  • [26] Screening for yellow flags in first-time acute low back pain: Reliability and validity of a Norwegian version of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire
    Grotle, M
    Vollestad, NK
    Brox, JI
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2006, 22 (05) : 458 - 467
  • [27] The Swedish version of the Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire: A clinimetric study of validity and reliability
    Krantz, Rasmus
    Rasmussen-Barr, Eva
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2023, 39 (01) : 154 - 162
  • [28] Reliability and Factorial Validity of the Turkish Version of the Pain Disability Index in Rheumatic Patients With Chronic Pain
    Ugurlu, Mustafa
    Ugurlu, Gorkem Karakas
    Erten, Sukran
    Ulusoy Kaymak, Semra
    Caykoylu, Ali
    ARCHIVES OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 31 (03) : 265 - 271
  • [29] A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale
    Fritz, JM
    Irrgang, JJ
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2001, 81 (02): : 776 - 788
  • [30] Reliability and aspects of validity of the Swedish version of self-efficacy for exercise scale for patients with chronic pain
    Dahlback, Angelica
    Andrell, Paulin
    Varkey, Emma
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2023, 39 (01) : 163 - 173