Thinking about commitment: Accessibility of commitment and prediction of relationship persistence, accommodation, and willingness to sacrifice

被引:65
作者
Etcheverry, PE [1 ]
Le, BJ
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Haverford Coll, Haverford, PA 19041 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00104.x
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Research has demonstrated that more accessible cognitive constructs (e.g., attitudes, stereotypes) are more likely to influence thoughts and behaviors. The current research applies a social cognition framework to the prediction of romantic relationship persistence (i.e., "stay-leave" behavior), accommodation, and willingness to sacrifice. Conceptualizing commitment as a partially cognitive construct and following from social cognition and attitudinal research, we hypothesized that the accessibility of commitment will moderate the association between commitment and relationship persistence, accommodative responses, and willingness to sacrifice. In Study 1, participants in romantic relationships responded to statements derived from the commitment subscale of the Investment Model Scale. Reaction times to these statements were used as a measure of accessibility of commitment. In addition, participants completed measures of their commitment level. Seven months later, participants were contacted and relationship persistence was assessed. Accessibility of commitment significantly moderated the association between commitment and relationship persistence. Study 2 expanded on the results of the first study by demonstrating that accessibility of commitment also significantly moderated the association between commitment and accommodation and willingness to sacrifice. Taken together, these two studies highlight the usefulness of applying social cognitive concepts to understand close relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 123
页数:21
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   The conceptualization of marital commitment: An integrative analysis [J].
Adams, JM ;
Jones, WH .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 72 (05) :1177-1196
[2]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions
[3]   Being committed: Affective, cognitive, and conative components of relationship commitment [J].
Arriaga, XB ;
Agnew, CR .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2001, 27 (09) :1190-1203
[4]  
ARRIAGA XB, 2004, UNPUB PURDUE U
[5]   PRIMING RELATIONSHIP SCHEMAS - MY ADVISER AND THE POPE ARE WATCHING ME FROM THE BACK OF MY MIND [J].
BALDWIN, MW ;
CARRELL, SE ;
LOPEZ, DF .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 26 (05) :435-454
[6]   RELATIONAL SCHEMAS AND THE PROCESSING OF SOCIAL INFORMATION [J].
BALDWIN, MW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (03) :461-484
[7]   Social-cognitive conceptualization of attachment working models: Availability and accessibility effects [J].
Baldwin, MW ;
Keelan, JPR ;
Fehr, B ;
Enns, V ;
KohRangarajoo, E .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (01) :94-109
[8]  
Bargh J.A., 1990, HDB MOTIVATION COGNI, V2, P93
[9]   AUTOMATICITY OF CHRONICALLY ACCESSIBLE CONSTRUCTS IN PERSON X SITUATION EFFECTS ON PERSON PERCEPTION - ITS JUST A MATTER OF TIME [J].
BARGH, JA ;
LOMBARDI, WJ ;
HIGGINS, ET .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 55 (04) :599-605
[10]   THE ADDITIVE NATURE OF CHRONIC AND TEMPORARY SOURCES OF CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBILITY [J].
BARGH, JA ;
BOND, RN ;
LOMBARDI, WJ ;
TOTA, ME .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 50 (05) :869-878