Impact of the Mayo Adhesive Probability Score on Donor and Recipient Outcomes After Living-donor Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective, Single-center Study of 782 Transplants

被引:1
|
作者
Sato, Yu [1 ]
Noguchi, Hiroshi [1 ]
Mei, Takanori [1 ]
Kaku, Keizo [1 ]
Okabe, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Nakamura, Masafumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Surg & Oncol, Fukuoka, Japan
来源
TRANSPLANTATION DIRECT | 2021年 / 7卷 / 08期
关键词
ADHERENT PERINEPHRIC FAT; RISK-FACTORS; CLASSIFICATION; COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTOR; THICKNESS; SYSTEM; INDEX;
D O I
10.1097/TXD.0000000000001185
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. This study was performed to assess the impact of the Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score on donor and recipient outcomes after living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Methods. We retrospectively analyzed 782 transplants involving LDKT between February 2008 and October 2019 to assess the correlation between the MAP score and outcome after LDKT. We divided the transplants into 2 groups according to the donor MAP score: 0 (MAP(0)) and 1-5 (MAP(1-5)). Results. Compared with the MAP(0) group, donors in the MAP(1-5) group were significantly older, had higher body mass index, and were more likely to be men. The prevalences of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes were also higher among donors in the MAP(1-5) group than among donors in the MAP(0) group. Operative time, estimated blood loss during donor nephrectomy, and percentage of glomerular sclerosis were significantly greater in the MAP(1-5), group than in the MAR(0) group. Donor and recipient perioperative complications were comparable between the 2 groups; death-censored graft survival rates also did not significantly differ between groups. Although the recipient mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from postoperative d 1 to 7 was significantly higher in the MAP, group than in the MAP(1-5) group (P=0.007), eGFR reductions within 5 y after transplantation were similar between groups. There were no significant differences between groups in recipient mortality and biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes within 1 y after transplantation. Additionally, multivariate analysis showed that the only factors affecting recipient eGFR at postoperative d 7 were donor age, recipient age, and female sex (P <0.001, <0.001, and =0.004, respectively). Conclusions. The MAP score did not influence surgical complications or graft survival; therefore, it should not affect donor selection.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Recipient Splenic Artery Utilization for Arterial Re-Anastomosis in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Single-Center Experience
    Piskin, Turgut
    Demirbas, Tolga
    Yalcin, Levent
    Yaprak, Onur
    Dayangac, Murat
    Guler, Necdet
    Bulutcu, Fusun
    Yuzer, Yildiray
    Tokat, Yaman
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 59 (116) : 1263 - 1264
  • [32] Single-center retrospective analysis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients after deceased donor renal transplantation
    Zou, Jilin
    Wang, Tianyu
    Qiu, Tao
    Zhou, Jiangqiao
    Chen, Zhongbao
    Ma, Xiaoxiong
    Jin, Zeya
    Xu, Yu
    Zhang, Long
    TRANSPLANT IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 72
  • [33] Deceased vs living donor grafts for pediatric simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: A single-center experience
    Gautier, Sergey
    Monakhov, Artem
    Tsiroulnikova, Olga
    Voskanov, Mikhail
    Miloserdov, Igor
    Dzhanbekov, Timur
    Meshcheryakov, Sergey
    Latypov, Robert
    Chekletsova, Elena
    Malomuzh, Olga
    Khizroev, Khizri
    Dzhiner, Deniz
    Pashkova, Irina
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 2020, 34 (06)
  • [34] Simpson's paradox and the impact of donor-recipient race-matching on outcomes post living or deceased donor kidney transplantation in the United States
    Lv, Kaikai
    Wu, Yangyang
    Lai, Wenhui
    Hao, Xiaowei
    Xia, Xinze
    Huang, Shuai
    Luo, Zhenjun
    Lv, Chao
    Qing, Yuan
    Song, Tao
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 9
  • [35] Outcomes and Complications of Donor and Recipient of Renal Transplantation: An Experience from Tertiary Care Center - A Retrospective Observational Study
    Punia, Sahil
    Sadasukhi, Nripesh
    Sadasukhi, Trilok Chand
    Gupta, Hoti Lal
    Gupta, Manish
    Sharma, Ashish
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 18 (02) : 121 - 126
  • [36] Recent Advancements in and Views on the Donor Operation in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Study of 886 Patients Over 13 Years
    Suh, Kyung-Suk
    Suh, Suk-Won
    Lee, Jeong-Moo
    Choi, YoungRok
    Yi, Nam-Joon
    Lee, Kwang-Woong
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 21 (03) : 329 - 338
  • [37] Outcome of Hepatitis B Virus Infection After Living-Donor Liver Transplant: A Single-center Experience Over 20 Years
    Nafady-Hego, Hanaa
    Elgendy, Hamed
    Nafady, Asmaa
    Uemoto, Shinji
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 14 (02) : 207 - 214
  • [38] Risk factors for BK virus infection in living-donor renal transplant recipients: a single-center study from China
    Li, Ping
    Cheng, Dongrui
    Wen, Jiqiu
    Xie, Kenan
    Li, Xue
    Ni, Xuefeng
    Ji, Shuming
    Chen, Jinsong
    RENAL FAILURE, 2018, 40 (01) : 442 - 446
  • [39] The Impact of a Surgical Protocol for Enhanced Recovery on Living Donor Right Hepatectomy A Single-Center Cohort Study
    Kim, Seong Hoon
    Kim, Young Kyu
    Lee, Seung Duk
    Lee, Eung Chang
    Park, Sang Jae
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (14)
  • [40] One-year Outcome of Everolimus With Standard-dose Tacrolimus Immunosuppression in De Novo ABO-incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective, Single-center, Propensity Score Matching Comparison With Mycophenolate in 42 Transplants
    Noguchi, Hiroshi
    Tsuchimoto, Akihiro
    Ueki, Kenji
    Kaku, Keizo
    Okabe, Yasuhiro
    Nakamura, Masafumi
    TRANSPLANTATION DIRECT, 2020, 6 (01): : E514