Antibiotic interactions shape short-term evolution of resistance in E. faecalis

被引:21
作者
Dean, Ziah [1 ]
Maltas, Jeff [1 ]
Wood, Kevin B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Biophys, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Phys, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ENTEROCOCCUS-FAECALIS; ENDOCARDITIS; COMBINATIONS; SENSITIVITY; GENTAMICIN; MANAGEMENT; AMPICILLIN; MODULATE; PATHS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.ppat.1008278
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Antibiotic combinations are increasingly used to combat bacterial infections. Multidrug therapies are a particularly important treatment option for E. faecalis, an opportunistic pathogen that contributes to high-inoculum infections such as infective endocarditis. While numerous synergistic drug combinations for E. faecalis have been identified, much less is known about how different combinations impact the rate of resistance evolution. In this work, we use high-throughput laboratory evolution experiments to quantify adaptation in growth rate and drug resistance of E. faecalis exposed to drug combinations exhibiting different classes of interactions, ranging from synergistic to suppressive. We identify a wide range of evolutionary behavior, including both increased and decreased rates of growth adaptation, depending on the specific interplay between drug interaction and drug resistance profiles. For example, selection in a dual beta-lactam combination leads to accelerated growth adaptation compared to selection with the individual drugs, even though the resulting resistance profiles are nearly identical. On the other hand, populations evolved in an aminoglycoside and beta-lactam combination exhibit decreased growth adaptation and resistant profiles that depend on the specific drug concentrations. We show that the main qualitative features of these evolutionary trajectories can be explained by simple rescaling arguments that correspond to geometric transformations of the two-drug growth response surfaces measured in ancestral cells. The analysis also reveals multiple examples where resistance profiles selected by drug combinations are nearly growth-optimized along a contour connecting profiles selected by the component drugs. Our results highlight trade-offs between drug interactions and resistance profiles during the evolution of multi-drug resistance and emphasize evolutionary benefits and disadvantages of particular drug pairs targeting enterococci. Author summary Antibiotics are increasingly used in combinations to combat difficult bacterial infections, including those caused by the opportunistic pathogen E. faecalis. Some pairs of drugs exhibit particularly strong inhibitory effects when used simultaneously, as each drug magnifies the effects of the other, a phenomenon known as synergy. Other drug combinations may counteract one another, an effect called antagonism. These antibiotic "interactions" form the basis of powerful antimicrobial therapies, but they may also impact the emergence of drug resistance in surprising ways. In this work, we studied the evolution of antibiotic resistance using laboratory evolution of E. faecalis populations exposed to different two-drug combinations. We found that cells adapt more rapidly to certain drug combinations, while other antibiotic pairs markedly slow resistance. The modulated adaptation results from the interplay of drug interactions and the evolved resistance to each individual drug. Despite a wide range of observed evolutionary behavior, we find that our results can be intuitively understood using simple rescaling arguments that describe how resistance mutations impact the effective concentration of each drug. These findings highlight trade-offs between drug interactions and resistance profiles during the evolution of multi-drug resistance and emphasize evolutionary benefits and disadvantages of particular drug pairs targeting enterococci.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ENTEROCOCCI COMMENSA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI US, V109, pE1377
[3]   Management of multidrug-resistant enterococcal infections [J].
Arias, C. A. ;
Contreras, G. A. ;
Murray, B. E. .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2010, 16 (06) :555-562
[4]   Infective Endocarditis in Adults: Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Therapy, and Management of Complications A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association [J].
Baddour, Larry M. ;
Wilson, Walter R. ;
Bayer, Arnold S. ;
Fowler, Vance G., Jr. ;
Tleyjeh, Imad M. ;
Rybak, Michael J. ;
Barsic, Bruno ;
Lockhart, Peter B. ;
Gewitz, Michael H. ;
Levison, Matthew E. ;
Bolger, Ann F. ;
Steckelberg, James M. ;
Baltimore, Robert S. ;
Fink, Anne M. ;
O'Gara, Patrick ;
Taubert, Kathryn A. .
CIRCULATION, 2015, 132 (15) :1435-1486
[5]   Antibiotic combination efficacy (ACE) networks for a Pseudomonas aeruginosa model [J].
Barbosa, Camilo ;
Beardmore, Robert ;
Schulenburg, Hinrich ;
Jansen, Gunther .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2018, 16 (04)
[6]   Alternative Evolutionary Paths to Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance Cause Distinct Collateral Effects [J].
Barbosa, Camilo ;
Trebosc, Vincent ;
Kemmer, Christian ;
Rosenstiel, Philip ;
Beardmore, Robert ;
Schulenburg, Hinrich ;
Jansen, Gunther .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2017, 34 (09) :2229-2244
[7]   Spatiotemporal microbial evolution on antibiotic landscapes [J].
Baym, Michael ;
Lieberman, Tami D. ;
Kelsic, Eric D. ;
Chait, Remy ;
Gross, Rotem ;
Yelin, Idan ;
Kishony, Roy .
SCIENCE, 2016, 353 (6304) :1147-1151
[8]   Multidrug evolutionary strategies to reverse antibiotic resistance [J].
Baym, Michael ;
Stone, Laura K. ;
Kishony, Roy .
SCIENCE, 2016, 351 (6268)
[9]   A Review of Combination Antimicrobial Therapy for Enterococcus faecalis Bloodstream Infections and Infective Endocarditis [J].
Beganovic, Maya ;
Luther, Megan K. ;
Rice, Louis B. ;
Arias, Cesar A. ;
Rybak, Michael J. ;
LaPlante, Kerry L. .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 67 (02) :303-309
[10]   Nonoptimal Microbial Response to Antibiotics Underlies Suppressive Drug Interactions [J].
Bollenbach, Tobias ;
Quan, Selwyn ;
Chait, Remy ;
Kishony, Roy .
CELL, 2009, 139 (04) :707-718