Diagnostic accuracy of EUS compared with MRCP in detecting choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy in head-to-head studies

被引:121
作者
Meeralam, Yaser [1 ]
Al-Shammari, Khalil [1 ]
Yaghoobi, Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Div Gastroenterol, 1280 Main St West,Rm-2F, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
关键词
BILE-DUCT STONES; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; SUSPECTED CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; BILIARY OBSTRUCTION; GALLSTONE DISEASE; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.009
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: There is a wide range of reported sensitivity and specificity for EUS and MRCP in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis, with lack of a proper meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy by using head-to-head comparison. Here, we aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of EUS and MRCP in detecting choledocholithiasis by using appropriate methodology recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. Methods: A comprehensive electronic literature search up to January 2017 was done by 2 reviewers for prospective cohort studies comparing EUS and MRCP to a reference standard for detecting choledocholithiasis. The acceptable reference standards were considered ERCP, intraoperative cholangiography, or clinical follow-up >3 months for negative cases. Quality of the included studies was measured by using the QUADAS-2 tool. A bivariate hierarchical model was used to perform the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Summary receiver operating characteristics were developed and the area under the curve was calculated. Results: A total of 5 of 32 studies were included. No study presented a high risk of bias. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.97 (range, 0.91-0.99) and 0.90 (range, 0.83-0.94) for EUS and 0.87 (range, 0.80-0.93) and 0.92 (range, 0.87-0.96) for MRCP. The overall diagnostic odds ratio of EUS was significantly higher than the one with MRCP (162.5 vs 79.0, respectively; P = .008). Further analysis showed that this was mainly due to the significantly higher sensitivity of EUS as compared with that of MRCP (P = .006). The specificity was not significantly different between 2 modalities (P = .42). Conclusion: Both EUS and MRCP provide good diagnostic accuracy, with EUS providing statically better diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity, with comparable specificity. EUS should be incorporated in the diagnostic algorithm in patients suspected of choledocholithiasis whenever appropriate.
引用
收藏
页码:986 / 993
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Predicting the likelihood of a persistent bile duct stone in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis: accuracy of existing guidelines and the impact of laboratory trends [J].
Adams, Megan A. ;
Hosmer, Amy E. ;
Wamsteker, Erik J. ;
Anderson, Michelle A. ;
Elta, Grace H. ;
Kubiliun, Nisa M. ;
Kwon, Richard S. ;
Piraka, Cyrus R. ;
Scheiman, James M. ;
Waljee, Akbar K. ;
Hussain, Hero K. ;
Elmunzer, B. Joseph .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 82 (01) :88-93
[2]   Is there a difference in diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact between endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography? [J].
Ainsworth, AP ;
Rafaelsen, SR ;
Wamberg, PA ;
Durup, J ;
Pless, TK ;
Mortensen, MB .
ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 35 (12) :1029-1032
[3]   Prospective study of endoscopic ultrasound performance in suspected choledocholithiasis [J].
Aljebreen, Abdulrahman ;
Azzam, Nahla ;
Eloubeidi, Mohamad A. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 23 (05) :741-745
[4]   PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF CLINICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL FEATURES OF SYMPTOMATIC CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS [J].
ANCIAUX, ML ;
PELLETIER, G ;
ATTALI, P ;
MEDURI, B ;
LIGUORY, C ;
ETIENNE, JP .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1986, 31 (05) :449-453
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, COCHRANE COLLABORATI
[6]   MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic Sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: A prospective, comparative study [J].
Aube, C ;
Delorme, B ;
Yzet, T ;
Burtin, P ;
Lebigot, J ;
Pessaux, P ;
Gondry-Jouet, C ;
Boyer, J ;
Caron, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (01) :55-62
[7]  
Badger WR, AM J SURG
[8]   A POPULATION STUDY ON THE PREVALENCE OF GALLSTONE DISEASE - THE SIRMIONE STUDY [J].
BARBARA, L ;
SAMA, C ;
LABATE, AMM ;
TARONI, F ;
RUSTICALI, AG ;
FESTI, D ;
SAPIO, C ;
RODA, E ;
BANTERLE, C ;
PUCI, A ;
FORMENTINI, F ;
COLASANTI, S ;
NARDIN, F .
HEPATOLOGY, 1987, 7 (05) :913-917
[9]   USEFUL PREDICTORS OF BILE-DUCT STONES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
BARKUN, AN ;
BARKUN, JS ;
FRIED, GM ;
GHITULESCU, G ;
STEINMETZ, O ;
PHAM, C ;
MEAKINS, JL ;
GORESKY, CA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1994, 220 (01) :32-39
[10]  
BILBAO MK, 1976, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V70, P314