Does hostile neck anatomy preclude successful endovascular aortic aneurysm repair?

被引:150
作者
Dillavou, ED [1 ]
Muluk, SC [1 ]
Rhee, RY [1 ]
Tzeng, E [1 ]
Woody, JD [1 ]
Gupta, N [1 ]
Makaroun, MS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Div Vasc Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00738-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Poor outcomes have been reported with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with hostile neck anatomy. Unsupported endografts with active fixation may offer certain advantages in this situation. We compared EVAR results using the Ancure (Guidant) endograft in patients with and without hostile neck anatomy. Methods: Records of EVAR patients from October 1999 to July 2002 at a tertiary care hospital were retrospectively reviewed from a division database. Patients with elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair during the same period were reviewed to determine those unsuitable for EVAR. Hostile neck anatomy, assessed by computer tomography (CT) scans and angiograms, was defined as one or more of the following: (1) neck length less than or equal to 10 mm, (2) focal bulge in the neck > 3 mm, (3) > 2-mm reverse taper within 1 cm below the renal arteries, (4) neck thrombus greater than or equal to 50% of circumference, and (5) angulation greater than or equal to 60 degrees within 3 cm below renals. Results: Three hundred and twenty-two patients underwent EVAR with an average follow-up of 18 months. Patients in Phase II trials (n = 41), repaired with other graft types (n = 48), or without complete anatomic records (n = 27) were excluded. Demographics and co-morbidities were similar in the 115 good-neck (GN) and 91 bad-neck (BN) patients except for age (mean, 72.9 years GN vs 75.7 BN; P = 0.13), gender (11% female GN vs 22% BN; P =.04); neck length (mean, 21.8 mm GN vs 14.4 mm BN: P < .001), and angulation (mean, 22 degrees GN vs 40 degrees BN; (P < .001). Perioperative mortality (0 GN vs 1.1%BN), late mortality (5.2% GN vs 4.4% BN), all endoleaks (19.1% GN vs 17.6% BN), proximal endoleaks (0.8% GN vs 2.1% BN), and graft migration (0 for both groups) did not reach statistical significance. Neck anatomy precluded EVAR in 106 of 165 (64%) patients with open AAA. Conclusions: Unsupported endografts with active fixation can yield excellent results in treating many medically compromised patients with hostile neck anatomy. Nonetheless, an unsuitable neck remains the most frequent cause for open abdominal AAA.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 663
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Mortality and morbidity following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Analysis of two single centre experiences [J].
Albertini, JN ;
Branchereau, A ;
Hopkinson, B ;
Magnan, PE ;
Bartoli, JM ;
Whitaker, SC ;
Davidson, I .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 22 (05) :429-435
[2]   Computed tomographic angiographic imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Implications for transfemoral endovascular aneurysm management [J].
Balm, R ;
Stokking, R ;
Kaatee, R ;
Blankensteijn, JD ;
Eikelboom, BC ;
vanLeeuwen, MS .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 26 (02) :231-237
[3]   Outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with conditions considered unfit for an open procedure: A report on the EUROSTAR experience [J].
Buth, J ;
van Marrewijk, CJ ;
Harris, PL ;
Hop, WCJ ;
Riambau, V ;
Laheij, RJF .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (02) :211-221
[4]   Impact of exclusion criteria on patient selection for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Carpenter, JP ;
Baum, RA ;
Barker, CF ;
Golden, MA ;
Mitchell, ME ;
Velazquez, OC ;
Fairman, RM .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 34 (06) :1050-1054
[5]   Identifying and grading factors that modify the outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Chaikof, EL ;
Fillinger, MF ;
Matsumura, JS ;
Rutherford, RB ;
White, GH ;
Blankensteijn, JD ;
Bernhard, VM ;
Harris, PL ;
Kent, KC ;
May, J ;
Veith, FJ ;
Zarins, CK .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (05) :1061-1066
[6]   Endograft migration one to four years after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with the AneuRx device: A cautionary note [J].
Conners, MS ;
Sternbergh, WC ;
Carter, G ;
Tonnessen, BH ;
Yoselevitz, M ;
Money, SR .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 36 (03) :476-482
[7]  
Dias NV, 2001, J ENDOVASC THER, V8, P268, DOI 10.1583/1545-1550(2001)008<0268:IPEDAS>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]   Endovascular stent grafting in the presence of aortic neck filling defects: Early clinical experience [J].
Gitlitz, DB ;
Ramaswami, G ;
Kaplan, D ;
Hollier, LH ;
Marin, ML .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 33 (02) :340-344
[10]   Endovascular grafting in patients with short proximal necks: an analysis of short-term results [J].
Greenberg, R ;
Fairman, R ;
Srivastava, S ;
Criado, F ;
Green, R .
CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 8 (05) :350-354