DBO Trajectory Planning and HAHP Decision-Making for Autonomous Vehicle Driving on Urban Environment

被引:4
|
作者
Zeng, Dequan [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Zhuoping [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Lu [1 ,2 ]
Fu, Zhiqiang [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Peizhi [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Hongtu [3 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Automot Studies, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Clean Energy Automot Engn Ctr, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, Coll Elect & Informat Engn, Shanghai 201800, Peoples R China
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2019年 / 7卷
关键词
Autonomous vehicle; trajectory planner; decision maker; urban environment; driving behavior orient; hierarchical analytic hierarchy process; statistical process control; SIGMA; AHP;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2953510
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A novel driving behaviour oriented (DBO) trajectory planner and hierarchical analytic hierarchy process (HAHP) decision maker are presented for intelligent vehicle. Since driving on structural road should satisfy actuator constraints and improve comfortableness as soon as possible, which strictly obeys traffic rules other than making traffic mess, it is rather than purely pursuing the shortest route/time. By analysis traffic rules, the DBO framework is employed to produce trajectories. To make trajectory drivable, cubic B-spline and clothoid curve are modeled to keep continuous curvature, and cubic polynomial curve is to schedule velocity profile satisfying stability and comfort. To pick out the best trajectory, HAHP decision maker is developed to evaluate the candidates. The first layer selects optimal paths considering smoothness and economy, and the second layer selects best trajectory taking smoothness, comfortableness and economy in account. Moreover, DBO rapidly exploring random tree (RRT) replanner is embedded to ensure algorithm completeness. Finally, several typical scenarios are designed to verify the real-time and reliability of the algorithm. The results illustrate that the algorithm has highly real-time and stability evaluated by Statistical Process Control method as the probability for the peak time less than 0.1s is 100% except three obstacles avoidance scenario is 59.31% in 1000 cycles. Since the planned trajectory is smooth enough and satisfy the constraints of the actuator, the mean lateral tracking error is less than 0.2m with 0.5m peak error, and the mean speed error less than 0.5km/h with 1.5km/h peak error for all scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:165365 / 165386
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intelligent, In-Vehicle Autonomous Decision-Making Functionality for Driving Style Reconfigurations
    Panagiotopoulos, Ilias
    Dimitrakopoulos, George
    ELECTRONICS, 2023, 12 (06)
  • [22] Planning and Decision-Making for Autonomous Vehicles
    Schwarting, Wilko
    Alonso-Mora, Javier
    Rus, Daniela
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF CONTROL, ROBOTICS, AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, VOL 1, 2018, 1 : 187 - 210
  • [23] An Autonomous Driving Framework for Long-term Decision-making and Short-term Trajectory Planning on Frenet Space
    Moghadam, Majid
    Elkaim, Gabriel Hugh
    2021 IEEE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (CASE), 2021, : 1745 - 1750
  • [24] Evolutionary Decision-Making and Planning for Autonomous Driving: A Hybrid Augmented Intelligence Framework
    Yuan, Kang
    Huang, Yanjun
    Yang, Shuo
    Wu, Mingzhi
    Cao, Dongpu
    Chen, Qijun
    Chen, Hong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2024, 25 (07) : 7339 - 7351
  • [25] Generic Trajectory Planning Algorithm for Urban Autonomous Driving
    Duhautbout, Thibaud
    Talj, Reine
    Cherfaoui, Veronique
    Aioun, Francois
    Guillemard, Franck
    2021 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED ROBOTICS (ICAR), 2021, : 607 - 612
  • [26] An interpretable decision-making model for autonomous driving
    Li, Yanfeng
    Guan, Hsin
    Jia, Xin
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [27] Resolving Conflict in Decision-Making for Autonomous Driving
    Geary, Jack
    Ramamoorthy, Subramanian
    Gouk, Henry
    ROBOTICS: SCIENCE AND SYSTEM XVII, 2021,
  • [28] Multi-vehicle Cooperative Decision-making and Trajectory Planning Based on Stackelberg Game Theory in Mixed Driving Environments
    Yan Y.-J.
    Peng L.
    Wang J.-X.
    Pi D.-W.
    Liu Y.-H.
    Yin G.-D.
    Zhongguo Gonglu Xuebao/China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2024, 37 (03): : 117 - 133
  • [29] Behavior Decision-making Method for Autonomous Vehicle
    Yang, Run
    Liu, Hang
    Yang, Cheng
    Zhou, Mingliang
    Cen, Ming
    2023 35TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, CCDC, 2023, : 772 - 778
  • [30] COLREGs-Adaptive trajectory planning and decision-making in maritime autonomous surface ships
    Han, Zhepeng
    Wu, Da
    Zhang, Jinfen
    Huang, Tao
    Han, Qing-Long
    Zhang, Mingyang
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2024, 312