Evaluation of intubating conditions with rocuronium and either propofol or etomidate for rapid sequence induction

We have assessed the effect of two induction agents on tracheal intubating conditions after rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg(-1) in unpremedicated patients undergoing simulated rapid sequence induction. Following pre-oxygenation, anaesthesia was induced with propofol up to 2.5 mg.kg(-1) (n = 35) or etomidate 0.3 mg.kg(-1) (n = 36), and further increments as required. After loss of verbal contact, cricoid pressure was applied and rocuronium was injected. Laryngoscopy was performed at 45 a and intubation attempted at 60 s after rocuronium had been given. Ninety-four per cent of patients in the propofol group had clinically acceptable (good or excellent) intubating conditions compared to only 75% in the etomidate group (p = 0.025). Owing to coughing, one patient in the etomidate group could not be intubated on the first attempt. A greater presser response also followed intubation after induction with etomidate. We conclude that etomidate and rocuronium alone cannot be recommended for intubation at 60 s under rapid sequence induction conditions.