Good Practices for Real-World Data Studies of Treatment and/or Comparative Effectiveness: Recommendations from the Joint ISPOR-ISPE Special Task Force on Real-World Evidence in Health Care Decision Making

被引:186
作者
Berger, Marc L.
Sox, Harold [1 ]
Willke, Richard J. [2 ]
Brixner, Diana L. [3 ]
Eichler, Hans-Georg [4 ]
Goettsch, Wim [5 ,6 ]
Madigan, David [7 ]
Makady, Amr [5 ,6 ]
Schneeweiss, Sebastian [8 ]
Tarricone, Rosanna [9 ]
Wang, Shirley V. [8 ]
Watkins, John [10 ]
Mullins, C. Daniel [11 ]
机构
[1] Patient Ctr Outcomes Res Inst, Washington, DC USA
[2] Int Soc Pharmacoecon & Outcomes Res, Lawrenceville, NJ USA
[3] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] European Med Agcy, London, England
[5] Zorginst Nederland, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
[7] Columbia Univ, New York, NY USA
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[9] Bocconi Univ, Milan, Italy
[10] Premera Blue Cross, Mountlake Terrace, WA USA
[11] Univ Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
comparative effectiveness; decision making; guidelines; pharmacoepidemiology; real-world data; treatment effectiveness; SECONDARY DATA SOURCES; RETROSPECTIVE DATABASE; DESIGN; DRUGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.3019
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose: Real-world evidence (RWE) includes data from retrospective or prospective observational studies and observational registries and provides insights beyond those addressed by randomized controlled trials. RWE studies aim to improve health care decision making. Methods: The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) and the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE) created a task force to make recommendations regarding good procedural practices that would enhance decision makers' confidence in evidence derived from RWD studies. Peer review by ISPOR/ISPE members and task force participants provided a consensus-building iterative process for the topics and framing of recommendations. Results: The ISPOR/ISPE Task Force recommendations cover seven topics such as study registration, replicability, and stakeholder involvement in RWE studies. These recommendations, in concert with earlier recommendations about study methodology, provide a trustworthy foundation for the expanded use of RWE in health care decision making. Conclusion: The focus of these recommendations is good procedural practices for studies that test a specific hypothesis in a specific population. We recognize that some of the recommendations in this report may not be widely adopted without appropriate incentives from decision makers, journal editors, and other key stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:1003 / 1008
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Guidelines for good pharmacoepidemiology practice (GPP) [J].
Andrews, Elizabeth B. ;
Arellano, Felix M. ;
Avorn, Jerry ;
Bortnichak, Edward A. ;
Chen, Robert ;
Dai, Wanju S. ;
de Abajo, Francisco J. ;
Dieck, Gretchen S. ;
de Vries, Corinne ;
Edlavitch, Stanley ;
Freiman, Joel ;
Hallas, Jesper ;
Jones, Judith K. ;
Koo, Linda ;
Kaufman, David W. ;
Kurz, Xavier ;
Lanes, Stephan ;
Mitchell, Allen A. ;
Moride, Yola ;
Nelson, Robert C. ;
Neutel, Ineke ;
Park, Byung-Joo ;
Perez-Gutthann, Susana ;
Reynolds, Robert ;
Sacks, Susan ;
Santanello, Nancy ;
Stang, Paul ;
Stergachis, Andrew ;
Strom, Brian L. ;
Stuermer, Til ;
Toh, Darren ;
Trontell, Anne ;
Walker, Alexander M. ;
Waller, Patrick ;
Watson, Douglas J. ;
West, Suzanne ;
Wilcock, Karen ;
Wise, Robert P. .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 25 (01) :2-10
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, PLOS MED
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Guidance for industry: Good pharmacovigilance practices and pharmacoepidemiologic assessment
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, INT C HARM TECHN REQ
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, GUID IND FDA STAFF B
[6]   The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement [J].
Benchimol, Eric I. ;
Smeeth, Liam ;
Guttmann, Astrid ;
Harron, Katie ;
Moher, David ;
Petersen, Irene ;
Sorensen, Henrik T. ;
von Elm, Erik ;
Langan, Sinead M. .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2015, 12 (10)
[7]   A Questionnaire to Assess the Relevance and Credibility of Observational Studies to Inform Health Care Decision Making: An ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force Report [J].
Berger, Marc L. ;
Martin, Bradley C. ;
Husereau, Don ;
Worley, Karen ;
Allen, J. Daniel ;
Yang, Winnie ;
Quon, Nicole C. ;
Mullins, C. Daniel ;
Kahler, Kristijan H. ;
Crown, William .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (02) :143-156
[8]   Prospective Observational Studies to Assess Comparative Effectiveness: The ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force Report [J].
Berger, Marc L. ;
Dreyer, Nancy ;
Anderson, Fred ;
Towse, Adrian ;
Sedrakyan, Art ;
Normand, Sharon-Lise .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (02) :217-230
[9]   Good Research Practices for Comparative Effectiveness Research: Defining, Reporting and Interpreting Nonrandomized Studies of Treatment Effects Using Secondary Data Sources: The ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report-Part I [J].
Berger, Marc L. ;
Mamdani, Muhammad ;
Atkins, David ;
Johnson, Michael L. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (08) :1044-1052
[10]  
Blair G., 2006, DECLARING DIAGNOSING