An expected event, but unprecedented damage Structure and gaps of large-scale response coordination of the 2011 Thailand floods

被引:38
作者
Yeo, Jungwon [1 ]
Comfort, Louise K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Sch Publ Adm, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
Social network analysis; 2011 Thailand flood; Large-scale disasters; Response coordination; EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT; HURRICANE KATRINA; NETWORKS; COMMUNICATION; CLIMATE; GOVERNANCE; PRIVATE; WATER; RISK;
D O I
10.1108/DPM-02-2017-0048
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to focus on the large-scale flood response coordination across sectors and jurisdictions, investigating the characteristics and gaps of the 2011 Thailand flood response operations. Design/methodology/approach - The large-scale flood response coordination was measured as an inter-organizational network. An extensive content analysis of news reports was conducted to identify the participating organizations and relationships among them that emerged during the initial flood response operations. Social network analysis was used to examine the patterns and gaps of coordination among the organizations. Findings - The research identified three major gaps that might weaken the response coordination. First, the coordination structure was highly fragmented with many isolated actors. Second, the benefit of inter-sector relationships was not well leveraged in the system due to weak reciprocal relationships across sectors. Third, provincial level organizations did not serve as a strong liaison between local actors ( cities) and national actors. Practical implications - Based on the findings, the research offers suggestions to improve the performance of response coordination in recurring flood disasters. Originality/value - This study is distinctive in its examination of structural characteristics of large-scale, inter-sector and multi-jurisdictional flood response coordination in Thailand. Previous studies have explored how citizens were organized and responded to flood disasters at the local level, and measured indicators or causes of response resilience at the provincial level system. Yet, studies examining the patterns of coordination structure among response organizations across all affected-jurisdictional authorities and sectors have been lacking.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 470
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Abbasi A., 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/ACM Int'l Conference on Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and Int'l Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom), P819, DOI 10.1109/GreenCom-CPSCom.2010.57
  • [2] Agranoff R., 2008, Public Performance Management Review, V31, P320
  • [3] Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers
    Agranoff, Robert
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2006, 66 : 56 - 65
  • [4] Ahmad QK, 2003, NAT HAZARDS, V28, P181
  • [5] Sources of organisational resiliency during the Thailand floods of 2011: a test of the bonding and bridging hypotheses
    Andrew, Simon
    Arlikatti, Sudha
    Siebeneck, Laura
    Pongponrat, Kannapa
    Jaikampan, Kraiwuth
    [J]. DISASTERS, 2016, 40 (01) : 65 - 84
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2020, MAKING POLICY HAPPEN, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781003060697-5
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2015, ITALIAN J PUBLIC
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL
  • [9] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2005, Understanding institutional diversity