Optimal SARS-CoV-2 vaccine allocation using real-time attack-rate estimates in Rhode Island and Massachusetts

被引:22
作者
Thu Nguyen-Anh Tran [1 ]
Wikle, Nathan B. [2 ]
Albert, Emmy [3 ]
Inam, Haider [4 ]
Strong, Emily [2 ]
Brinda, Karel [5 ,6 ]
Leighow, Scott M. [4 ]
Yang, Fuhan [1 ]
Hossain, Sajid [7 ]
Pritchard, Justin R. [4 ]
Chan, Philip [8 ]
Hanage, William P. [5 ]
Hanks, Ephraim M. [2 ]
Boni, Maciej F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Ctr Infect Dis Dynam, Dept Biol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Ctr Infect Dis Dynam, Dept Stat, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Phys, 104 Davey Lab, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[4] Penn State Univ, Ctr Infect Dis Dynam, Dept Bioengn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[5] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Communicable Dis Dynam, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Biomed Informat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Yale Univ, Yale Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[8] Brown Univ, Dept Med, Providence, RI 02912 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; Vaccination; Optimal vaccine allocation; Mathematical modeling; Real-time seroprevalence; COVID-19; VACCINE; INFLUENZA; EPIDEMIC; SIZE;
D O I
10.1186/s12916-021-02038-w
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundWhen three SARS-CoV-2 vaccines came to market in Europe and North America in the winter of 2020-2021, distribution networks were in a race against a major epidemiological wave of SARS-CoV-2 that began in autumn 2020. Rapid and optimized vaccine allocation was critical during this time. With 95% efficacy reported for two of the vaccines, near-term public health needs likely require that distribution is prioritized to the elderly, health care workers, teachers, essential workers, and individuals with comorbidities putting them at risk of severe clinical progression.MethodsWe evaluate various age-based vaccine distributions using a validated mathematical model based on current epidemic trends in Rhode Island and Massachusetts. We allow for varying waning efficacy of vaccine-induced immunity, as this has not yet been measured. We account for the fact that known COVID-positive cases may not have been included in the first round of vaccination. And, we account for age-specific immune patterns in both states at the time of the start of the vaccination program. Our analysis assumes that health systems during winter 2020-2021 had equal staffing and capacity to previous phases of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic; we do not consider the effects of understaffed hospitals or unvaccinated medical staff.ResultsWe find that allocating a substantial proportion (>75%) of vaccine supply to individuals over the age of 70 is optimal in terms of reducing total cumulative deaths through mid-2021. This result is robust to different profiles of waning vaccine efficacy and several different assumptions on age mixing during and after lockdown periods. As we do not explicitly model other high-mortality groups, our results on vaccine allocation apply to all groups at high risk of mortality if infected. A median of 327 to 340 deaths can be avoided in Rhode Island (3444 to 3647 in Massachusetts) by optimizing vaccine allocation and vaccinating the elderly first. The vaccination campaigns are expected to save a median of 639 to 664 lives in Rhode Island and 6278 to 6618 lives in Massachusetts in the first half of 2021 when compared to a scenario with no vaccine. A policy of vaccinating only seronegative individuals avoids redundancy in vaccine use on individuals that may already be immune, and would result in 0.5% to 1% reductions in cumulative hospitalizations and deaths by mid-2021.ConclusionsAssuming high vaccination coverage (>28%) and no major changes in distancing, masking, gathering size, hygiene guidelines, and virus transmissibility between 1 January 2021 and 1 July 2021 a combination of vaccination and population immunity may lead to low or near-zero transmission levels by the second quarter of 2021.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 Variants [J].
Abu-Raddad, Laith J. ;
Chemaitelly, Hiam ;
Butt, Adeel A. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 385 (02) :187-189
[2]   Dynamics of annual influenza A epidemics with immuno-selection [J].
Andreasen, V .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY, 2003, 46 (06) :504-536
[4]   A comparative analysis of influenza vaccination programs [J].
Bansal, Shweta ;
Pourbohloul, Babak ;
Meyers, Lauren Ancel .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2006, 3 (10) :1816-1825
[5]   Influenza drift and epidemic size: the race between generating and escaping immunity [J].
Boni, MF ;
Gog, JR ;
Andreasen, V ;
Christiansen, FB .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 65 (02) :179-191
[6]   Model-informed COVID-19 vaccine prioritization strategies by age and serostatus [J].
Bubar, Kate M. ;
Reinholt, Kyle ;
Kissler, Stephen M. ;
Lipsitch, Marc ;
Cobey, Sarah ;
Grad, Yonatan H. ;
Larremore, Daniel B. .
SCIENCE, 2021, 371 (6532) :916-+
[7]  
Buchanan L., 2020, NY TIMES
[8]   Vaccine designers take first shots at COVID-19 [J].
Cohen, Jon .
SCIENCE, 2020, 368 (6486) :14-16
[9]   CoMix: comparing mixing patterns in the Belgian population during and after lockdown [J].
Coletti, Pietro ;
Wambua, James ;
Gimma, Amy ;
Willem, Lander ;
Vercruysse, Sarah ;
Vanhoutte, Bieke ;
Jarvis, Christopher I. ;
Van Zandvoort, Kevin ;
Edmunds, John ;
Beutels, Philippe ;
Hens, Niel .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
[10]   Estimated transmissibility and impact of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England [J].
Davies, Nicholas G. ;
Abbott, Sam ;
Barnard, Rosanna C. ;
Jarvis, Christopher, I ;
Kucharski, Adam J. ;
Munday, James D. ;
Pearson, Carl A. B. ;
Russell, Timothy W. ;
Tully, Damien C. ;
Washburne, Alex D. ;
Wenseleers, Tom ;
Gimma, Amy ;
Waites, William ;
Wong, Kerry L. M. ;
van Zandvoort, Kevin ;
Silverman, Justin D. ;
Diaz-Ordaz, Karla ;
Keogh, Ruth ;
Eggo, Rosalind M. ;
Funk, Sebastian ;
Jit, Mark ;
Atkins, Katherine E. ;
Edmunds, W. John .
SCIENCE, 2021, 372 (6538) :149-+