ANOPP landing-gear noise prediction with comparison to model-scale data

被引:6
|
作者
Burley, Casey L. [1 ]
Brooks, Thomas F. [1 ]
Humphreys, William M., Jr. [1 ]
Rawls, John W., Jr. [2 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
[2] Lockheed Martin Space Operat Langley Program Off, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1260/147547209788549299
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The NASA Aircraft NOise Prediction Program (ANOPP) offers two empirically based methods to predict landing gear noise: the "Fink" method and the "Guo" method. The "Guo" method is the most recent and was developed almost exclusively using Boeing full-scale landing gear data. The "Fink" method was developed over 25 years ago, using both model and full-scale data. The details of the two methods are compared and contrasted. The Fink method is found to follow Strouhal scaling, and hence predictions are made with the scale model geometry as input. The Guo method was found not to scale for arbitrary sized landing gear and hence the method required full-scale geometry inputs and the resulting predictions required scaling in order to compare with the measured model results. Application of these methods to a model-scale landing gear is investigated by comparing predicted results from each method with measured acoustic data obtained for a high-fidelity, 6.3%-scale, Boeing 777 main landing gear. The measurements were obtained in the NASA Langley Quiet Flow Facility for a range of Mach numbers at a large number of observer angles. Noise spectra and contours as a function of polar and azimuthal angle characterize the directivity of landing gear noise. The measured spectra and contours are compared to predictions made using the Fink method and to scaled predictions from the Guo method. This is the first time an extensive set of landing gear noise directivity data are available to compare and assess predictive capabilities. Both methods predict comparable amplitudes and trends for the flyover locations, but deviate at sideline locations. Neither method fully captures the measured noise directivity.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 475
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Framework for a Landing-Gear Model and Acoustic Prediction
    Lopes, Leonard V.
    Brentner, Kenneth S.
    Morris, Philip J.
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2010, 47 (03): : 763 - 774
  • [2] Creation of landing-gear simulation model
    Dong, Y
    SYSTEM SIMULATION AND SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING (SHANGHAI), VOLS I AND II, 2002, : 85 - 88
  • [3] Improved Model of Landing-Gear Drop Dynamics
    Wei, Xiaohui
    Liu, Chenglong
    Liu, Xiangyao
    Nie, Hong
    Shao, Yizhou
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2014, 51 (02): : 695 - 700
  • [4] Landing-gear noise prediction using high-order finite difference schemes
    Liu, Wen
    Kim, Jae Wook
    Zhang, Xin
    Angland, David
    Caruelle, Bastien
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2013, 332 (14) : 3517 - 3534
  • [5] A statistical model for landing gear noise prediction
    Guo, YP
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2005, 282 (1-2) : 61 - 87
  • [6] Bifurcation Study of a Dynamic Model of a Landing-Gear Mechanism
    Knowles, James A. C.
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2016, 53 (05): : 1468 - 1477
  • [7] Noise spectra and directivity for a scale-model landing gear
    Humphreys, William M., Jr.
    Brooks, Thomas F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AEROACOUSTICS, 2009, 8 (05) : 409 - 443
  • [8] Towards Noise Prediction for Rudimentary Landing Gear
    Spalart, Philippe R.
    Shur, Mikhail L.
    Strelets, Mikhail K.
    Travin, Andrey K.
    IUTAM SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL AERO-ACOUSTICS FOR AIRCRAFT NOISE PREDICTION, 2010, 6 : 283 - 292
  • [9] PROPELLER NOISE AT MODEL-SCALE AND FULL-SCALE
    TREBBLE, WJG
    WILLIAMS, J
    DONNELLY, RP
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1983, 20 (01): : 34 - 41
  • [10] Investigation of Unsteady Surface Pressures over a Two-Wheeled Landing-Gear Model
    Gatto, A.
    Graham, W. R.
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2017, 54 (01): : 272 - 283