Effects of Desensitizers, Temporary Cements, and Dentin Cleaning Methods on the Bond Strength of Self-Etch/Adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin: An In Vitro Study

被引:1
|
作者
Ugur, Mehmet [1 ]
Kavut, Idris [1 ]
Kulunk, Safak [2 ]
Akdeniz, Mehmet Serif [3 ]
Tanrikut, Ozgur Ozan [1 ]
机构
[1] Van Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Fac Dent, TR-65080 Van, Turkey
[2] On Dokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Samsun, Turkey
[3] Bingol Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Bingol, Turkey
关键词
Desensitizers; Temporary cements; Dentin cleansing methods; Resin cements; Bond strength; PROVISIONAL CEMENT; LUTING CEMENT; ADHESIVE; AGENTS; LASER;
D O I
10.1177/23202068211052796
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of desensitizer, temporary cements, dentin cleaning methods on shear bond strength (SBS) of self-etch and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. Materials and Methods: Four hundred eighty buccal or lingual/palatine coronal portions of human molar teeth were mounted in the acrylic blocks. Teeth surfaces were prepared until the dentin was exposed. Specimens were divided into four groups. One group separated as control and three groups of teeth were treated with a desensitizing agent containing calcium-phosphate desensitizer (Teethmate Desensitizer, TMD), resin-based self-reinforcing monomer (Shield Force Plus, SFP) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and glutaraldehyde (Gluma Desensitizer). Two different temporary cement containing calcium hydroxide (Dycall) and zinc oxide based (Rely X Temp NE) temporary cement were applied to the dentin surfaces. Temporary cement was removed with one of three cleansing techniques: 2% chlorhexidine digluconate and glass particles containing agent (Consepsis Scrub), cleansing bur (OptiClean), and intra/extracoronal rotary brush (Starbrush). All groups were further divided into two cementation subgroups (Panavia V5 and Panavia SA). The SBS (MPa) was measured using a universal testing machine at 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. The data were analyzed statistically with a four-way analysis of variance and Tukey's Honest Significant Difference test (alpha = 0.05). Results: Although SFP showed higher SBS, there was no statistically significant difference between other groups (P > .05). There were no significant differences between temporary cements (P > .05). OptiClean rotary bur showed higher mean SBS values in all groups. The dual-polymerized Panavia V5 showed the highest SBS values in all groups (P < .05). Conclusion: Cleaning of dentin surface from temporary cement remnants with a silicon bur and dual-cure resin cement showed the highest bond strength values.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 104
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] In Vitro Study of the Influence of Dentin Desensitizing and Sealing on the Shear Bond Strength of Two Universal Resin Cements
    Sailer, Irena
    Tettamanti, Sandro
    Stawarczyk, Bogna
    Fischer, Jens
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2010, 12 (05): : 381 - 392
  • [32] BOND STRENGTH OF SELF-ETCH ADHESIVES WITH PRIMARY AND PERMANENT TEETH DENTIN - IN VITRO STUDY
    Gateva, Natalia
    Dikov, Valentin
    JOURNAL OF IMAB, 2012, 18 (02): : 168 - 173
  • [33] Bond Strengths of Two Self-adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin with Different Treatments
    Chen, Chen
    He, Feng
    Burrow, Michael F.
    Xie, Haifeng
    Zhu, Ye
    Zhang, Feimin
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 31 (01) : 73 - 77
  • [34] Effect of Storage Time on Microtensile Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive and Multi-Step Resin Cements to Dentin
    Carvalho, Edilausson Moreno
    Padilha de Souza, William Lillicker
    Carvalho, Ceci Nunes
    Maciel, Adeilton Pereira
    Loguercio, Alessandro Dourado
    Bauer, Jose
    MATERIALS RESEARCH-IBERO-AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERIALS, 2016, 19 (03): : 695 - 701
  • [35] Long-term bond strength of fiber posts cement to dentin with self-adhesive or conventional resin cements
    Mendes, Monique
    Gomes Franca, Fabiana Mantovani
    Basting, Roberta Tarkany
    Turssi, Cecilia Pedroso
    Botelho do Amaral, Flavia Lucisano
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 31 (09) : 977 - 987
  • [36] Evaluation of Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Cements to Dentin With or Without Application of Adhesive Systems
    Barcellos, Daphne Camara
    Batista, Graziela Ribeiro
    da Silva, Melissa Aline
    Rangel, Patricia Maria
    Gomes Torres, Carlos Rocha
    Fava, Marcelo
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2011, 13 (03): : 261 - 265
  • [37] Bonding Strength of Self-adhesive Resin Cements to Human Dentin: A Critical Review
    Acar, Ozlem
    Ozdemir, Erdem
    REVIEWS OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2013, 1 (03): : 346 - 364
  • [38] Bond strength of modern self-adhesive resin cements to human dentin and different CAD/CAM ceramics
    Malysa, Andrzej
    Wezgowiec, Joanna
    Danel, Dariusz
    Boening, Klaus
    Walczak, Katarzyna
    Wieckiewicz, Mieszko
    ACTA OF BIOENGINEERING AND BIOMECHANICS, 2020, 22 (02) : 25 - 34
  • [39] INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT SURFACE CONDITIONING PROTOCOLS ON MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF SELF-ADHESIVE RESIN CEMENTS TO DENTIN
    Pisani-Proenca, Jatyr
    Guilherme Erhardt, Maria Carolina
    Amaral, Regina
    Valandro, Luiz Felipe
    Bottino, Marco Antonio
    Del Castillo-Salmeron, Ramon
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2011, 105 (04): : 227 - 235
  • [40] Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin
    Bouillaguet, S
    Troesch, S
    Wataha, JC
    Krejci, I
    Meyer, JM
    Pashley, DH
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2003, 19 (03) : 199 - 205