Comparison of Tono-Pen Avia and Handheld Applanation Tonometry in Primary Congenital Glaucoma

被引:5
|
作者
Cronemberger, Sebastiao [1 ]
Veloso, Artur W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Visual Sci Lab, Dept Ophthalmol & Otorhinolaryngol, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
primary congenital glaucoma; intraocular pressure; applanation tonometry; Tono-pen; tonometry; ocular; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS; GOLDMANN APPLANATION; CORNEAL THICKNESS; OCULAR RIGIDITY; AXIAL LENGTH; ANESTHESIA; DIAMETER; CHILDREN; ICARE; EYE;
D O I
10.1097/IJG.0000000000001820
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Precis: Tono-Pen AVIA (TPA) intraocular pressure (IOP) values are different from those taken with handheld Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) in primary congenital glaucoma (PCG). These differences indicate both tonometers cannot be used interchangeably for measuring IOP in PCG. Purpose: The aim was to compare IOP measurements obtained using TPA and a handheld version of GAT in children with PCG. Materials and Methods: Forty-two eyes from 23 patients were evaluated for central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length, biomicroscopy and IOP measurement with TPA and a handheld GAT under inhalation anesthesia. After 1 eye from each patient was randomized, paired the Student t-test and the Pearson correlation were used for analysis. Generalized linear mixed model was used to estimate the difference between tonometers. Results: Mean age of children was 28.3 +/- 20.5 months. Mean axial length was 24.89 +/- 3.33 mm and mean CCT was 605.9 +/- 81.0 mu m. Mean IOP was 22.1 +/- 9.6 for TPA and 14.0 +/- 4.5 mm Hg for GAT. There was a significant difference of 8.1 +/- 6.9 mm Hg between TPA IOP and GAT IOP (P<0.001). Each 6 months increase in age was associated with 1.32 mm Hg reduction in the difference between tonometers (P=0.002) and each 1 mm Hg higher of mean GAT IOP was associated with -0.73 mm Hg in the difference between TPA and GAT (P=0.002). Also, for every 20 mu m increase in CCT an increase of 1.16 mm Hg in the difference between both devices was expected (P=0.003), after adjustment for potentially confounding variables. Conclusion: There is a significant difference between TPA IOP and GAT IOP in PCG. The difference between TPA and GAT in PCG is influenced by CCT, age and GAT IOP value.
引用
收藏
页码:E227 / E230
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intraocular Pressure in Primary Congenital Glaucoma (PCG): Draeger Applanation Tonometer versus Tono-pen Avia®
    Cronemberger, Sebastiao
    Veloso, Artur Abreu
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2020, 61 (07)
  • [2] Tono-Pen versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
    Bao, Bo
    Diaconita, Vlad
    Schulz, David C.
    Hutnik, Cindy
    OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA, 2019, 2 (06): : 435 - 439
  • [3] Twenty-four hours intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes assessed by applanation tonometry and Tono-Pen AVIA
    Rafael Vidal Merola
    Sebasti?o Cronemberger
    Artur William Veloso
    Alberto Diniz-Filho
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2022, (01) : 52 - 58
  • [4] TONO-PEN TONOMETRY
    BEAUMONT, P
    KANG, K
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1993, 77 (11) : 754 - 754
  • [5] Comparison of Scleral Tono-Pen Intraocular Pressure Measurements with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
    Badakere, Swathi Vallabh
    Choudhari, Nikhil S.
    Rao, Harsha L.
    Chary, C. Raghava
    Garudadri, Chandra Sekhar
    Senthil, Sirisha
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2018, 95 (02) : 129 - 135
  • [6] Twenty-four hours intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes assessed by applanation tonometry and Tono-Pen AVIA
    Merola, Rafael Vidal
    Cronemberger, Sebastiao
    Veloso, Artur William
    Diniz-Filho, Alberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 15 (01) : 52 - 58
  • [7] Comparison of Tono-Pen AVIA Intraocular Pressure Measurements Performed at Limbus With Central Corneal Tono-Pen AVIA Intraocular Pressure
    Sharma, Reetika
    Majumdar, Saptorishi
    Sobti, Amit
    Arora, Tarun
    Agarwal, Tushar
    Dada, Tanuj
    CORNEA, 2013, 32 (07) : 943 - 946
  • [8] COMPARISON OF THE TONO-PEN TO THE GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER
    FRENKEL, REP
    HONG, YJ
    SHIN, DH
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1988, 106 (06) : 750 - 753
  • [9] TONOMETRY COMPARISON - GOLDMANN VERSUS TONO-PEN
    KOONER, KS
    COOKSEY, JC
    BARRON, JB
    ZIMMERMAN, TJ
    GUPTE, RK
    WALL, JL
    ANNALS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1992, 24 (01): : 29 - 36
  • [10] Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, and Tono-Pen XL in edematous corneas
    Kontadakis, George A.
    Pennos, Alexandros
    Pentari, Iro
    Kymionis, George D.
    Pallikaris, Ioannis G.
    Ginis, Harilaos
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 12