Selecting indicators of soil, microbial, and plant conditions to understand ecological changes in Georgia pine forests

被引:21
作者
Dale, Virginia H. [1 ]
Peacock, Aaron D. [2 ]
Garten, Charles T., Jr. [1 ]
Sobek, Edward [3 ]
Wolfe, Amy K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Div Environm Sci, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Biomarker Anal, Knoxville, TN 37932 USA
[3] MDDS Inc, Knoxville, TN 37916 USA
关键词
discriminant analysis; disturbance; indicators; microbes; military land; soil; vegetation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.08.001
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Characterizing how resource use and management activities affect ecological conditions is necessary to document and understand anthropogenic changes in ecological systems. Resource managers on military installations have the delicate task of balancing the training needs of soldiers effectively with the need to maintain a high quality of ecological conditions. This study considers ways that ecological indicators can provide information on impacts that training has on environmental characteristics that occur at different scales and in different sectors of the environment. The characteristics examined include soil chemistry, soil microbes, and vegetation. A discriminant function analysis was conducted to determine whether ecological indicators could differentiate among different levels of military use. A combination of 10 indicators explained 90% of the variation among plots from five different military use levels. Results indicated that an appropriate suite of ecological indicators for military resource managers includes soil, microbial, and vegetation characteristics. Since many of these indicators are related, managers at this location potentially have freedom to choose indicators that are relatively easy to measure, without sacrificing information. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:818 / 827
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Andrews SS, 2001, ECOL APPL, V11, P1573, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1573:DASQAT]2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Ecological Indicators for the Nation
[4]  
BLIGH EG, 1959, CAN J BIOCHEM PHYS, V37, P911
[5]  
Bohlen PJ, 2001, ECOLOGY, V82, P965, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0965:PSMIIA]2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   COMPARISON OF FIELD METHODS IN VEGETATION MONITORING [J].
BRAKENHIELM, S ;
LIU, QH .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1995, 79 (1-4) :75-87
[8]  
Braun-Blanquet J., 1932, Plant sociology: the study of plant communities, VFirst, DOI DOI 10.5962/BHL.TITLE.7161
[9]   Identification of regional soil quality factors and indicators: I. Central and southern high plains [J].
Brejda, JJ ;
Moorman, TB ;
Karlen, DL ;
Dao, TH .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2000, 64 (06) :2115-2124
[10]   A PROPOSED FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPING INDICATORS OF ECOSYSTEM HEALTH [J].
CAIRNS, J ;
MCCORMICK, PV ;
NIEDERLEHNER, BR .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 1993, 263 (01) :1-44