3D PET reconstruction with FORE and WLS-OS-EM

被引:0
|
作者
Stearns, CW [1 ]
Fessler, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] GE Co, Med Syst, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
来源
2002 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM, CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-3 | 2003年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
2D PET reconstructions by the ordered subsets version of the AIL-EM algorithm (typically referred to as "OS-EM") assume that the random- and scattered-corrected coincidence data retain their Poisson statistics. Negative projection values, which are possible after these subtractive corrections, are either truncated at zero counts or accommodated by adding an offset to the projection data, and to the corresponding forward-projected values, during the algorithm. These methods are effective due to the relatively low scatter and random fractions of most 2D PET acquisitions. In 3D PET data, particularly in acquisitions in the body, the scatter and random fractions are much higher. As a result, the OS-EM algorithm may not be the most appropriate for reconstruction for rebinned 3D PET data. We have implemented an ordered-subsets version of the weighted least-squares expectation maximization (WLS-EM) algorithm, or WLS-OS-EM, which is based on a Gaussian approximation to the statistics of the rebinned data. The weights used in the algorithm are based on the attenuation correction factors applied to the data. WLS-OS-EM exhibits faster, and more consistent, convergence than ML-OS-EM for projection data sets with substantial negative projection values created by subtractive data corrections.
引用
收藏
页码:912 / 915
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of the parameterization of FORE-WLS reconstruction in 3D whole-body PET imaging
    Wollenweber, SD
    2002 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM, CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-3, 2003, : 1486 - 1489
  • [2] Ultrafast EM-OSLE for cluster reconstruction in fully 3D PET
    Hong, I. K.
    Cho, Z. H.
    2007 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-11, 2007, : 3461 - +
  • [3] Comparison of FORE with 3DRP reconstructions for 3D PET
    Bai, Bing
    Mann, J. J.
    Parsey, R. V.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2008, 41 : T60 - T60
  • [4] Validation on an anthropomorphic phantom of FORE optimization in 3D PET
    De Bernardi, Elisabetta
    Mazzoli, Marco
    Zito, Felicia
    Baselli, Giuseppe
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2007, 571 (1-2): : 247 - 250
  • [5] Evaluation of OS-EM vs ML-EM for 1D, 2D and fully 3D SPECT reconstruction
    Kamphuis, C
    Beekman, FJ
    Viergever, MA
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1996, 43 (03) : 2018 - 2024
  • [6] Use of a fast EM algorithm for 3D image reconstruction with the YAP-PET tomograph
    Motta, A
    Damiani, C
    Del Guerra, A
    Di Domenico, G
    Zavattini, G
    COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 2002, 26 (05) : 293 - 302
  • [7] A SYSTEM FOR THE 3D RECONSTRUCTION OF RETRACTED-SEPTA PET DATA USING THE EM ALGORITHM
    JOHNSON, CA
    YAN, YC
    CARSON, RE
    MARTINO, RL
    DAUBEWITHERSPOON, ME
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1995, 42 (04) : 1223 - 1227
  • [8] IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION OF THE EM ALGORITHM FOR 3D PET
    GUERRERO, TM
    LEVIN, CS
    HUANG, SC
    DAHLBOM, M
    CHERRY, SR
    HOFFMAN, EJ
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1994, 35 (05) : P187 - P187
  • [9] Evaluation of OS-EM vs. ML-EM for 1D, 2D and fully 3D SPECT reconstruction
    Kamphuis, Chris
    Beekman, Freek J.
    Viergever, Max A.
    IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 1996, 43 (3 pt 2): : 2018 - 2024
  • [10] Comparison of 3-D reconstruction with 3D-OSEM and with FORE plus OSEM for PET
    Liu, X
    Comtat, C
    Michel, C
    Kinahan, P
    Defrise, M
    Townsend, D
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2001, 20 (08) : 804 - 814