Reflections on the ecosystem services of whales and valuing their contribution to human well-being

被引:39
作者
Cook, David [1 ]
Malinauskaite, Laura [2 ]
Davidsdottir, Brynhildur [1 ]
Ogmundardottir, Helga [3 ]
Roman, Joe [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iceland, Sch Engn & Nat Sci, Environm & Nat Resources, Saemundargotu 2, IS-102 Reykjavik, Iceland
[2] Univ Iceland, Social & Human Sci, Environm & Nat Resources, Saemundargotu 2, IS-102 Reykjavik, Iceland
[3] Univ Iceland, Saemundargotu 2, IS-102 Reykjavik, Iceland
[4] Univ Vermont, Rubenstein Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Gund Inst Environm, Johnson House,617 Main St, Burlington, VT USA
关键词
Classifying; Marine; Values; Valuation; Planning; Whales; Ecosystem services; INTEGRATED VALUATION; DECISION-MAKING; METAL LEVELS; VALUES; SEA; BIODIVERSITY; INFORMATION; PERSPECTIVE; RECREATION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105100
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
Although whale ecosystem services have been scarcely explored in the academic literature, they illustrate many of the threats, trade-offs and decision-making dilemmas common to marine ecosystem services in general climate change impacts, the ongoing need to provide remote communities with forms of sustenance, and the potential development of new economic sectors which are prosperous but undermine traditional ways of life. In this paper, the first evaluation is carried out of the ecosystem services specific to whales, involving (a) their classification using the established Common International Classification Ecosystem Services (CICES) framework, (b) an assessment of the most suitable methods for their valuation, and (c) implications for decision-making. Our findings are that whale ecosystem services belong to all three categories of the CICES classification and cultural services are the most common type. The most suitable approach for the respective valuation of each service depends on the local socio-cultural context, a fundamental ingredient in value formation, which can formulate on either an individual or collective basis. In the case of individual value formation, this paper recommends the use of economic information derived from non-market valuation techniques; for collective, non-monetary techniques are advised. Given the complexity of human-environment interactions, a pluralist approach to valuation is likely to be required, whereby decision-makers are informed about impacts to whale ecosystem services through a mixture of economic and non-monetary information. A logical consequence of value pluralism is the need for decision-support platforms which can satisfactorily integrate different types of information concerning ecosystem service impacts, evaluating these against multiple marine management objectives. The paper briefly reflects on the potential of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to fulfil this ambition, before discussing some of the current challenges and barriers which have limited the uptake of ecosystem services research in marine planning and decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 133 条
[51]   From good to eat to good to watch: whale watching, adaptation and change in Icelandic fishing communities [J].
Einarsson, Niels .
POLAR RESEARCH, 2009, 28 (01) :129-138
[52]   Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making [J].
Fisher, Brendan ;
Turner, R. Kerry ;
Morling, Paul .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (03) :643-653
[54]  
Garmendia Eneko., 2013, The Justices and Injustices of Ecosystem Services, P161, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203395288-25
[55]   Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning [J].
Gomez-Baggethun, Erik ;
Barton, David N. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 86 :235-245
[56]   Indirect Effects of Global Change: From Physiological and Behavioral Mechanisms to Ecological Consequences [J].
Gunderson, Alex R. ;
Tsukimura, Brian ;
Stillman, Jonathon H. .
INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 57 (01) :48-54
[57]   The gap between science and policy: Assessing the use of nonmarket valuation in estuarine management based on a case study of US federally managed estuaries [J].
Guo, Jing ;
Kildow, Judith .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 108 :20-26
[58]  
Haines-Young R., 2018, Environ. Sci, DOI DOI 10.3897/ONEECO.3.E27108
[59]   Near-term priorities for the science, policy and practice of Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning (CMSP) [J].
Halpern, Benjamin S. ;
Diamond, Jordan ;
Gaines, Steve ;
Gelcich, Stefan ;
Gleason, Mary ;
Jennings, Simon ;
Lester, Sarah ;
Mace, Amber ;
McCook, Laurence ;
McLeod, Karen ;
Napoli, Nicholas ;
Rawson, Kit ;
Rice, Jake ;
Rosenberg, Andrew ;
Ruckelshaus, Mary ;
Saier, Bettina ;
Sandifer, Paul ;
Scholz, Astrid ;
Zivian, Anna .
MARINE POLICY, 2012, 36 (01) :198-205
[60]   INFORMATION AND THE CONCEPT OF OPTION VALUE [J].
HANEMANN, WM .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1989, 16 (01) :23-37