The health insurance system and psychoanalytic psychotherapy in Japan: the association with evidence-based practice

被引:1
作者
Okada, Akiyoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Fac Environm & Informat Studies, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
关键词
health insurance; medical fee system; evidence-based practice; psychoanalytic training; weekly psychotherapy; GUIDELINES; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1080/02668734.2021.1952648
中图分类号
B84-0 [心理学理论];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Since 1958, the Japanese public health insurance system has covered psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Although it is called 'standard-type psychoanalytic therapy', it is essentially psychoanalytic psychotherapy or psychodynamic psychotherapy performed face-to-face once a week. Japan has two psychoanalytical organisations: the Japan Psychoanalytic Society (JPS) and the Japan Psychoanalytical Association (JPA), both established in 1955. Until they separated in 1980, they were one organisation that worked together to secure government approval for medical insurance coverage of psychoanalytic psychotherapy and contributed to training psychiatrists and clinical psychologists in psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Currently, less than 1% of psychiatrists and clinical psychologists in the country have undergone JPA or JPS training. Psychoanalytic psychotherapy provision nationally is difficult because psychoanalytic psychotherapists are concentrated in urban centres. Recent global trends have prompted the demand for evidence-based practice (EBP). To date, the effectiveness of psychoanalytic psychotherapy has not been demonstrated in Japan. Therefore, it is not recognised as an EBP within national measures for public mental health. However, psychoanalytic psychotherapy is essentially an 'experience-based practice', even though it is fundamentally different from EBP. Nevertheless, to sustain psychoanalytic psychotherapy as a viable psychotherapy in Japan, it would need to meet EBP standards.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 299
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   A Multisite Health System Survey to Assess Organizational Context to Support Evidence-Based Practice [J].
Pittman, Joyce ;
Cohee, Andrea ;
Storey, Susan ;
LaMothe, Julie ;
Gilbert, Jason ;
Bakoyannis, Giorgos ;
Ofner, Susan ;
Newhouse, Robin .
WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2019, 16 (04) :271-280
[32]   Psychotherapy and evidence-based process management [J].
Schiepek, G. .
NERVENHEILKUNDE, 2008, 27 (12) :1138-1146
[33]   Promoting evidence-based practice: training health professionals for the evidence synthesis [J].
Batista Cardoso, Daniela Filipa ;
Simoes Marques Santos, Diana Gabriela ;
Cunha Rodrigues, Joana Filipa ;
Bento, Nichole ;
Clemente Rodrigues, Rogerio Manuel ;
Dos Reis Marques Cardoso, Ana Filipa .
REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2021, 55
[34]   Styles of Evidence-Based Practice in the Child Welfare System [J].
Cunningham, W. M. Scott ;
Duffee, David E. .
JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-INFORMED SOCIAL WORK, 2009, 6 (02) :176-197
[35]   Evidence-based practice: a retrograde step? The importance of pluralism in evidence generation for the practice of health care [J].
Clarke, JB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 1999, 8 (01) :89-94
[36]   Nursing based evidence: moving beyond evidence-based practice in mental health nursing [J].
Geanellos, R .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2004, 10 (02) :177-186
[37]   Economic evidence for evidence-based practice [J].
Stone, PW ;
Curran, CR ;
Bakken, S .
JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2002, 34 (03) :277-282
[38]   Evidence-based practice in local public health service in Ghana [J].
Owusu-Addo, E. ;
Cross, R. ;
Sarfo-Mensah, P. .
CRITICAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 27 (01) :125-138
[39]   Evidence-Based Nurse Case Management Practice in Community Health [J].
Joo, Jee Young ;
Huber, Diane L. .
PROFESSIONAL CASE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 19 (06) :265-273
[40]   INTEGRATING EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE INTO ORAL HEALTH CLINICAL PRACTICE: STUDENTS' PERSPECTIVES [J].
Wong, Grace ;
Monatzerolghaem, Maryam ;
Gerzina, Tania .
JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2019, 19 (01) :79-85