Intrinsic Subtypes and Androgen Receptor Gene Expression in Primary Breast Cancer. A Meta-Analysis

被引:9
作者
Cruz-Tapias, Paola [1 ]
Rubiano, Wilson [2 ]
Rondon-Lagos, Milena [1 ]
Villegas, Victoria-E [3 ]
Rangel, Nelson [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pedag & Tecnol Colombia, Sch Biol Sci, Tunja 150003, Colombia
[2] Univ Rosario, Hosp Univ Mayor Mederi, Bogota 111411, Colombia
[3] Univ Rosario, Fac Ciencias Nat, Ctr Invest Microbiol & Biotecnol UR CIMBIUR, Bogota 111221, Colombia
[4] Pontificia Univ Javeriana, Fac Ciencias, Dept Nutr & Bioquim, Bogota 110231, Colombia
来源
BIOLOGY-BASEL | 2021年 / 10卷 / 09期
关键词
androgen receptor; intrinsic subtypes; breast cancer; meta-analysis; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; TUMOR-SUPPRESSOR; ESTROGEN; GROWTH; CELLS; ENZALUTAMIDE; OUTCOMES; THERAPY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/biology10090834
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Breast cancer (BC) is the second largest cause of death for cancer in women worldwide. Different studies have shown that the androgen receptor (AR), a cytoplasmic ligand-dependent transcription factor, may play a role as a marker of BC biology. We aimed to assess the clinical significance of AR gene expression in BC by meta-analysis of large-scale microarray transcriptomic datasets. Our findings suggest that high mRNA levels of AR have the potential to be a promising non-invasive prognostic biomarker for the identification of the less aggressive BC subtypes. The androgen receptor (AR) is frequently expressed in breast cancer (BC), but its association with clinical and biological parameters of BC patients remains unclear. Here, we investigated the association of AR gene expression according to intrinsic BC subtypes by meta-analysis of large-scale microarray transcriptomic datasets. Sixty-two datasets including 10315 BC patients were used in the meta-analyses. Interestingly, AR mRNA level is significantly increased in patients categorized with less aggressive intrinsic molecular subtypes including, Luminal A compared to Basal-like (standardized mean difference, SMD: 2.12; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.88 to 2.35; p < 0.001) or when comparing Luminal B to Basal-like (SMD: 1.53; CI: 1.33 to 1.72; p < 0.001). The same trend was observed when analyses were performed using immunohistochemistry-based surrogate subtypes. Consistently, the AR mRNA expression was higher in patients with low histological grade (p < 0.001). Furthermore, our data revealed higher levels of AR mRNA in BC patients expressing either estrogen or progesterone receptors (p < 0.001). Together, our findings indicate that high mRNA levels of AR are associated with BC subgroups with the less aggressive clinical features.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Androgen receptor expression and clinical significance in breast cancer
    Yao, Ningning
    Han, Lei
    Sun, Han
    Zhou, Liangjian
    Wei, Zhiyong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 23 (01)
  • [32] Prognostic relevance of receptor tyrosine kinase expression in breast cancer: A meta-analysis
    Templeton, Arnoud J.
    Diez-Gonzalez, Laura
    Ace, Olga
    Vera-Badillo, Francisco
    Seruga, Bostjan
    Jordan, Joaquin
    Amir, Eitan
    Pandiella, Atanasio
    Ocana, Alberto
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2014, 40 (09) : 1048 - 1055
  • [33] Central Nervous System Toxicity in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Network Meta-analysis
    Matsukawa, Akihiro
    Yanagisawa, Takafumi
    Rajwa, Pawel
    Fazekas, Tamas
    Miszczyk, Marcin
    Tsuboi, Ichiro
    Parizi, Mehdi Kardoust
    Laukhtina, Ekaterina
    Klemm, Jakob
    Chiujdea, Sever
    Mancon, Stefano
    Mori, Keiichiro
    Kimura, Shoji
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Miki, Jun
    Kimura, Takahiro
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2025, 23 (01)
  • [34] Hedgehog gene expression patterns among intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer: Prognostic relevance
    Garcia-Martinez, Araceli
    Perez-Balaguer, Ariadna
    Ortiz-Martinez, Fernando
    Pomares-Navarro, Eloy
    Sanmartin, Elena
    Garcia-Escolano, Marta
    Montoyo-Pujol, Yoel G.
    Castellon-Molla, Elena
    Peiro, Gloria
    PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2021, 223
  • [35] The CAG repeat polymorphism of androgen receptor gene and prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
    Mingliang Gu
    Xiaoqun Dong
    Xuezhi Zhang
    Wenquan Niu
    Molecular Biology Reports, 2012, 39 : 2615 - 2624
  • [36] Intrinsic breast cancer subtypes defined by estrogen receptor signalling-prognostic relevance of progesterone receptor loss
    Braun, Lisa
    Mietzsch, Friederike
    Seibold, Petra
    Schneeweiss, Andreas
    Schirmacher, Peter
    Chang-Claude, Jenny
    Sinn, Hans Peter
    Aulmann, Sebastian
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 26 (09) : 1161 - 1171
  • [37] The Hormonal Receptor Status in Breast Cancer can be Altered by Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Ning
    Moran, Meena S.
    Huo, Qiang
    Haffty, Bruce G.
    Yang, Qifeng
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2011, 29 (09) : 594 - 598
  • [38] Prognostic significance of androgen receptor expression in invasive breast cancer: transcriptomic and protein expression analysis
    Aleskandarany, Mohammad A.
    Abduljabbar, Rezvan
    Ashankyty, Ibraheem
    Elmouna, Ahmed
    Jerjees, Dena
    Ali, Simak
    Buluwela, Laki
    Diez-Rodriguez, Maria
    Caldas, Carlos
    Green, Andrew R.
    Ellis, Ian O.
    Rakha, Emad A.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 159 (02) : 215 - 227
  • [39] The impact of IGF-IR expression on the outcomes of patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis
    Yan, Shunchao
    Jiao, Xin
    Li, Kai
    Li, Wusheng
    Zou, Huawei
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2015, 8 : 279 - 287
  • [40] Expression of the Androgen Receptor and its Correlation with Molecular Subtypes 980 Chinese Breast Cancer Patients
    Qi, Ji-ping
    Yang, You-lin
    Zhu, Hong
    Wang, Jianmin
    Jia, Ying
    Liu, Na
    Song, Yue-jia
    Zan, Li-kun
    Zhang, Xu
    Zhou, Min
    Yun-he, U.
    Liu, Tao
    Hicks, David G.
    Tang, Ping
    BREAST CANCER-BASIC AND CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 6 : 1 - 8